If a manufacture did decide to start lowering their fuel economy standards that would certainly be a competitive disadvantage against the manufacturers that chose to continue to press on and get better fuel economy.

Yes. But now they won’t be forced to do it. Fundamental difference.

This just in: companies that remain in business make money.

Men at track days are far superior to the randos at race events, when it comes to treating women, at least is my experience.

Well the R32 (MKIV) was at least good to look at. I do not think the supply of half-blind, torque steer loving fan boys will be there for this car.

I wish catalytic converters worked the way the author described. Every car would have an afterburner, there would be flames everywhere on the road. It would be awesome.

Sir, that first sentence is a thing of beauty.

To be fair, it’s even more impressive that it’s been documented that the Patriot missile actually knocked something out of the air, even if it were near stationary. Lets not hold the Patriot’s less than stellar track record up to the Iron Dome, for example.

I was going in a completely another direction with this.

This was my initial response as well. Its freaking impressive.

omg can you imagine if there’s another cold war and they blame a Jalopnik sub-blog for it

And yet the most American solution was thought up by the Dutch

Most shitty drivers don’t know they’re shitty drivers if the antics of the geriatric population of my almost rural town is any indication.

I was thinking about this more. Other games are urban warfare, which gives you opportunities to maneuver away from snipers. My least favorite BF3 and 4 maps were those wide open maps that had cranes or high buildings that allowed people to get up there and sit the whole game. One of the things that helped combat those…

Don’t get caught up with the model number, the CX-5 was the replacement for the CX-7. It’s actually bigger in cargo volume.

Then hate life after the first out of warranty repair.

Anything with a rotary engine in it.

Go easy on them, they just want to play at being “hard-hitting videogame journalists” even if it means grilling someone on why they made the controversial decision to make their game fun.

Seriously lol wtf was this? He’s pressing the poor guy to explain why they made the multiplayer fun???? Between this and listing a “jingoistic message” as a major flaw of Ghost Recon, this site is somehow managing to hit a new low.

Bought, Played 3 games and deleted it, then went back to Battlefield 4. Game did not seem polished to me in visuals and controls, IMO BF4 was better in this area.