The only possible way you can challenge my post, as I already said, is if you cite parts of the movie that support the article's review and contradict my post. You haven't done so. You are just butthurt that I called out the review for the garbage it really is. But you have no mean to show I am wrong. So you pout and…

It's ironic you should post about a movie you didn't watch.

No I didn't miss the fact you don't know what you are talking about and you need to copy and paste someone else's post because you are incapable of independent thought. How about you ask your mom to take you to see the movie, so you can post something intelligent about it?

Since you don't know me, you don't know how respected and regarded I am. And no he has no substance to share. In fact you pointed to NO substance whatsoever. Because there isn't any, buddy. Go back to the crayons.

Coming from somebody who made a post completely irrelevant to the matter at hand, I can only laugh. Good try buddy, good try. Now go back to your crayons.

Right, you didn't. So why are you posting here, again?

Well well, I see my post struck a nerve. I must have got it right! I can also see you have no objections related to the points I made, no "actually the movie said ABC therefore the review is right to say XYZ". In fact I don't think you have even seen the movie at all. Shouldn't you stop yapping about what you don't…

No, I thought I'd answer that terrible review. If it disturbs you, you are welcome to move on to another article.

I just saw the movie and I think this review is a completely unnecessary puff piece. Sounds almost like the author is ticked off that Malala is more respected and regarded than him. Maybe because unlike the author, she actually has some substance to share.