slulawgsr
Krul
slulawgsr

Yea, anything can happen, but Leicester have shown resilience and have avoided injuries so far. My point was that Spurs are not in as great of a position as this article sounds. If I was reading this and wasn't as well versed in the Prem as I am, I'd assume Spurs are even on points or something with Leicester.

Billy, have you checked Leicester’s remaining fixtures? United, Chelsea, Southampton and West Ham are the only games that even vaguely raise concern. And I am saying it is a very vague concern. Tottenham has a similar schedule but toss in Liverpool as well instead of West Ham. Am I missing something here? Sure Spurs

The only unwritten rules I give a flying fuck about, is celebrate when you’ve actually done something (and it’s completed) and don’t take a play off. You can be as flare-ful and as demonstrative or boastful as you like, but don’t do it until you’re positive, it is a no doubt dinger. I can’t stand but get infuriated

Salty. I approve.

Hot take. Good Kinja.

True...id be fine with us completely capitulating to Leicester just to spite your beloved Spurs. 🙊⚒⚒

Haha act like that 7th minute dagger to your heart didn't hurt...it's okay, we know it didn't, not really anyways. Those tears are just seasonal allergies. Pollens already bad.

I think we are agreeing in an albeit it muddled fashion. It COULD be used against them and it would definitely be used by opposing counsel in the future, but I am offering the argument that would counter that position. It would be against public policy to force every situation like this to be litigated. Whether or not

Yes, true, but what you described is a different situation. This isn’t a fairness situation, the choice to pursue would be a business choice based off the price to recover. Now if you offer two employees with similar service time and work quality, differing severance amounts then sure. But here this was an error and

That’s not entirely true OR accurate. Their choice isn’t precedent setting. Sure it might come up, but any judge worth his salt would recognize that the choice to pursue a debt is a business choice and not legal precedent. If they over paid him $5 and didn’t pursue it that doesn’t mean they relinquish their right to

Jesus. A perfect storm of aggression and douchery. It’s amazing she didn’t just knife the opposition and then accuse everyone of being jealous of her team’s success and conspiring against her...

The least surprising fact of this story is that the player bashing heads with her stick is from a Philly suburb. If you can’t beat them, well never mind, she did beat them in the head. With her stick. Repeatedly.

Well, yes and no. I agree with you, but our true things that will literally sink this country are Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid. Mainly because military spending is discretionary spending and if shit ever got bad enough we can reduce that. However, SS and Medicare/Medicaid are mandatory spending and make up an

I think fucking cats is illegal...I mean I hate to trample your freedoms but, yea. #CommaTruther

I completely support the refs decision. Right or wrong the ref is the ref. Can we all agree we are happy Schmidt didn't come back out and murder the ref?

What a ridiculous statement. Watch out! Soccer is coming to ruin all your other sports! First basketball, no hockey! Next it'll be the NFL and MLB! Soccer is the Syrian refugees of sports! Hell bent on ruining and destroying our way of sports life!

“We get it Barry, everyone hates Philly.” Fixed that for you.

Well if they removed the wood there would have been, but I'm sure they left it in until they got to the hospital and staunched the bleeding there and sutured. I think the writer was trying to relate that there wasn't a bunch of blood spilling out on the gym floor. Lots of impalements won't bleed until removed.

Yea because the NBA doesn't flop at all. Get out of here.

Ummmm then how do you explain the different game modes? And the different story lines? This makes no sense. Maybe the in game AI itself?