I want Starship Troopers styled propaganda videos. Would you like to know more?

I am right there with you on that. A running documentary, week-by-week, or an old-timey newsreel.

Wow, that was pretty good.

Eve, that video game that is way more fun and entertaining to read about all the crazy things that happen instead of actually playing it.

Interesting, I’m of the opposite opinion. I think a small portion of the federal budget should be set aside for presidential elections and private donations disallowed so influence cannot be overtly purchased. I agree that money isn’t innately evil, but I also have to acknowledge it holds influence over people.

yeah except that’s not at all what’s happening. in a civil suit like this, to win, you have to prove damages. so the plaintiff here is arguing how she suffered for over a decade from the trauma of the abuse. that seems reasonable. note, the longer the plaintiff waits to file, the more damages accumulate. for example,…

The internet is a neutral medium. It’s people who are terrible.

Yeah, it’s weird. Probably just one of those, “Notice me, Sempai!” things my tween daughter is always going on about. At some point it just gets uncomfortable, especially when the DSpin writers come out in force to humiliate anyone who notices it and comments.

Fusiiiiion Hya.

teaching me to play XCOM instead

Okay Julian, here are the secrets to making you great at this game:

Why is the default assumption that if all big men shot their FTs underhand, they’d automatically turn into passable shooters? If there’s actual evidence for this, I’d like to see it.

It absolutely is and if it affected the pace and balance of the game to the same level then I would be in favor of a change of some sort. However, it at least matches the situation (shooting foul =shots) . It requires the player to be holding the ball and shooting, which limits the instances it occurs, it is usually…

Glad you gave it a glowing reccomendation. Also glad you did it without spoilers. Kudos.

Shut the fuck up, idiot. I make two self-deprecating posts, and all you can do is lecture me, incorrectly, about economics.

Uhhhh....the fact that the value may have increased or decreased is not what makes the analogy apt. What makes the analogy apt is that the money paid does not go to the seller, it goes to the reseller. In this case, the reseller is the guy I bought the ticket from. That is where my money went, NOT to Snyder. Any…