slomo788
Slomo788
slomo788

I guess only one thing is in order now: a promotion! Perhaps to the CIA, yes?

What is Autotune, then?

I smoke cigarettes. I don't abuse them. I'm not a ghost typing to you.

You know you could have gotten your point across without all the vitriol, right? I don't bring up these issues in every article on here, but it seemed relevant to this particular one. Sorry if it pissed you off, I'm pretty sure I still have a right to comment and I don't think I offended anyone. Everyone else was

Trust me, I understand the argument about rapes, employment opportunities/benefits, freedom to do what you want with your body, etc. I just wanted to take the discussion to a more personal level, and many feminist guys do end up looking like douchebags on that last "stretch," even if their views on all those other

" or are men chivalrous because they want to reap the rewards, so to speak"

"Because, if I like you, I will buy you shots and get us topless. True facts."

"I think it's good manners."

Hmm, interesting. I never considered the "you asked, you pay" angle. Makes much sense. But then unless you're a model a guy almost always has to make the first move, if only to prove that he's fun to be with even if he's not drop dead gorgeous. Also, would I still not look like a dick if I crossed my arms when the

See, the problem is doing it because you're a woman and to be polite kind of became intertwined. Nobody would care if I didn't hold the door or offer to pay for another guy (unless I were actually courting him, and even then as a "top"), but if you don't do it for a woman/girl you're impolite. Most of it is due to

I was considering posting this in the sexist/PUA article comments section, but I'm glad Jezebel posted this as it's way more appropriate (seriously, post more of these instead of sloppy stuff about celebrity couples, I think more people care about these topics and we guys stand to learn more from them). So here:

There will still be the problem of the form factor. How could someone enjoy playing Angry Birds (easy example, but there are tons of others, outside of gaming as well) on the screen of a BB Bold or Curve when it was designed to play on a 4" HTC/Motorola/Samsung phone?

Abuse of it is ruining health. Like everything that exists, even "healthy" things like lipid-soluble vitamins and of course, sugars and fats.

Yes, just like alcohol and tobacco.

I, on the other hand, see one for legalizing it. How much damage has moonshine done since the end of the Prohibition Era?

Cool ass screenname.

Again, you seem to be summarizing the facts of the case, and inevitably left out details that must have influenced the jury. If I'm wrong, and that's all that was available, then yes the prosecution was rash, the jury just flipped a coin and an injustice was made. Is it a double standard? Yes. But you don't bring the

"I actually do not think the asylum lie is close." Matter of opinion, I suppose. I see rape, and I do see a motive: it was asylum before, it's money now. Just because she admitted the lie doesn't whitewash it, it still stays relevant to this case. Let's stop acting like each case should be a "clean slate," this is not

This is a false equivalence. You can't just summon a theoretical case of self-defense and expect people to fight an argument based on it. This Diallo case is a very specific instance where the evidence is seemingly not enough and the testimony of the only witness is not trustworthy.

And people lie in courts as well. That asylum lie just seems to be particularly close to the case, and I can understand the prosecutors' reluctance to go forward. It sucks, but I guess we can add this to the list of "why not to lie on your asylum application."