slomo788
Slomo788
slomo788

Just to be clear, guys, this is not the defense "digging up her past" or a jury that's letting him go "scot-free." It's the prosecutors (those supposed to be on the accuser's side, along with the lawyer) who don't believe her enough to bring the case in front of a jury.

Two reasons: one, the prosecutor does not dig up stuff on the defendant prior to trial, they only have access to the accuser. Second, you don't need to prove your innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, but you must do it to prove someone's guilty.

Cheating about board games and lying about previous sexual assaults AND having an inconsistent story are obviously the same thing.

It's under 2k for the stock model.

If you upgrade some parts from the MBP it can easily reach those prices. The stock model does not start at $2,600.

It's the author's configuration. THe Z line usually starts under 2 grand. Still expensive, but it's not supposed to be a low-voltage computer like the Air, just a light/thin high-end laptop.

There are rumors that Apple's next move might be a 15" Air, but if it's urgent you should probably look elsewhere or "settle" for a MBP.

Sony's different departments are almost independent from each other. Sony Ericsson is there weakest link, and their TV's are now somewhat overpriced compared to Samsung's stuff, but their PC and videogame divisions are still excellent.

Great news, then.

If someone finds a way to put Honeycomb on them it would truly be incredible imo. But yeah, this article is absolutely right. If only for internet, social, entertainment, etc it's more than worth less than half the price of an iPod Touch. Plus it has Flash (more or less), so it's less dependent on an App store than

You do understand that not every single person matches those "average" profiles, right? It's a (past) trend that shows a (possible) correlation, not a prophecy.

Yeah, I don't think we'll see eye to eye on this.

So... Google Earth?

You had mentioned the iPad in the sales comparison, but again it's irrelevant here. Comsumers don't care if a product doesn't sell (unless they're fanboys and/or shareholders), only if it's well supported. Nobody would ask for a refund because something doesn't meet sales expectations, that would be absurd. But they

It does matter what Google says and does, because you can simply root and give the manufacturers the finger. Here, hack/root/jailbreak all you want, there's just a big nothing.

iOS was never part of the conversation until you mentioned it (it was whether Android is comparable to WebOS, remember?). Of course, compared to that gold standard Android blows (and again, it's due to the fragmentation Google hopes to solve with ICS). But it doesn't mean it's comparable to a dead platform hoping for

Anyone who is smart enough to turn a Xoom on will be able to install the OS without Motorola officially releasing it. Plus, you can still run the new apps even if you have an older OS installed. I really don't get how you can even begin to compare the two, but believe what you want. As the author said in the other

The point is very clear: if the Nexus S can run the next big Android release, there is no reason the Xoom 1 won't. Therefore your claims have zero basis.

That update just got released. Still not the same thing as Android, because there's a big "if." What happens if nobody wants to do anything with WebOS? A Xoom owner knows for sure he will get new apps everyday and software updates. A TP owner is at the mercy of a good Samaritain who will buy/license WebOS from HP. Who