So basically AC 1?

Yeah I think what Singer tried with this movie was to consolidate timelines and work with a clean slate. An alternate universe would defeat the purpose of a cohesive understandable plot. After all these movies are for a braoder audience and the whole multiverse thing is hard unless you are at least a little nerdy.

We had a commodore 64 it was around IDK, 1985-1986.

Yeah, but Ellen Paige was already Kitty, so the 70's setting was out of her reach, and since this movie tries its best to make sense, that storyline while it would be fun for canon fans, would've defeated the purpose of the movie.

As I said before the X-MEN average power is resurrection. So they can be killed and then the writers can just go "here have a pocket dimension" or "yeah you were catatonic" or "lets rescue this guy from this particular version of hell".

So therefore, wouldn't everyone alive in the new-2023 sequence have lived through the events of the upcoming movie, "X-Men: Apocalypse"?

Oh but Blink is a mess 'cause the one we see in the movie is likely the alternate universe version of Blink so an origin story would be almost impossible , and if it is indeed the "regular" Blink, then her story could make a whole trilogy, and not especially a very good one (sorry comic fellas I only enjoyed the…

Yes but pirating is easy and this guy loves a lazy way of life dude!.

By your logic you shouldn't attack his work, but his persona.

Go watch the movie, you might find you were wrong.

Oh, they're real, but I guess they just abduct sentient life forms... or cattle. And these two don't qualify as either of those.

None of these are true, but people choose to believe them because it makes them feel like they aren't missing anything by disregarding them.

Its a matter of taste, the big deal here is that they combine "valid" criticism with humor, and you can agree with either one, both or none of those things.

I've never heard any expert say that. Do yoo have any sources?. most studies show Finnish and a lot of other languages as harder, even Spanish is considered harder.

And dont forget french!, but that was actually my point, while other languages are harder to learn, english is tough to speak because it lacks a lot of special characters that are widely used in other languages, so in order to speak propperly you have to know the word. However this weird rules apply to a bunch of…

Hahaha, I was watching a romantic scene in a German film the other day (subtitled of course), and all I could think of was "damn!, without the subtitles this could very much be a guy explaining a girl how to operate a nuclear reactor", IDK maybe is 'cause germanic and slavic languages don't sound as rhythmic as most…

Yeah I saw something about that here:

I give you that, the lack of accents and special characters make pronunciation in english a mess, but the fact that vikings simplified old english made it easier in comparison to most germanic or romance languages which have very, very weird structures and some grammar rules that'll make you weep.

IDK, all languages have tricky exceptions and weird conjugations a lot use auxiliary verbs as a norm and have strange variations, some do a better job phonetically speaking, while others shine with neat grammar.