Coconut cream. Otherwise spot on.

No.

But...but that’s what we’re talking about, right? I mean, that’s what this article is about in part, is the judge ruling that she must use her name in the trial.

WHY THE HELL SHOULD SHE??

This is what I do not understand. Why is it ok for otherwise reasonable appearing people (not the obvious Trumpers) to have no problem at all with this double standard? I know we all know why, but...but I just wanted to say it out loud, I guess.

Proof positive they don’t, I guess.

So, her name won’t be out there if she’s required to use it at trial?

It’s an avoidable issue. The simple issues Kaepernick raised a few weeks ago, as well as issues about screening personality types, as well as LONG known issues about pay, support, and staffing levels are all well known. They just haven’t been addressed any more than they have been for fire fighters and EMTs.

Yes. I doubt she has millions of dollars like Rose does to protect herself from hecklers and nut cases.

This is a happy thought, but they are a far cry from having to write an essay about why you shouldn’t be fined $1,000.00. I imagine this guy makes a thousand bucks when he sneezes, so it would take a bit more than that to actually stop him making the accusers life miserable.

But I thought we were, like, totally sure that Chip is racist and insane. How is this possible?

what?

No, you don’t understand. Only bassguitarhero has valid points. All other points are null.

They don’t care about it, at any rate.

I dunno. I see your point, but once her name is out there, it’s out there. I don’t think “sanctions” are going to really make up for that or scare a legal team that claim that rape isn’t possible if the victim is over the age of consent.

The time frame makes it really clear, to me anyway. The first text from her is April and she tells him to leave her alone, he says he will. He contacts her again in early June and she makes it extra clear that he needs to leave her alone and “stop reaching out” to her. In July she finally goes to the cops, and in…

I’m on my way to get the littlest one!

I don’t think it’s clear that he doesn’t get it. It might be that he doesn’t get it, or it might be that he’s, you know, harassing and intimidating her. I mean, not taking no for an answer is kind of the definition of rape, isn’t it?

The part where he keeps saying he’ll leave her alone and then keeps turning up again is terrifying.

She clearly says she said no to sex before she came over, and that he did not respect that. What does that mean to you?