Others have posted 0-60 times from C&D and other sources which make far more sense given the TRX’s horsepower rating. 4.5 seconds just seems so ridiculously conservative.
Others have posted 0-60 times from C&D and other sources which make far more sense given the TRX’s horsepower rating. 4.5 seconds just seems so ridiculously conservative.
Tuned vs stock can’t be compared, anyone should know this.
How is Mercedes’ bad in the least? Up for reverse, down for drive, push the button for park. I mean we’re talking about PowerWheels level of simplicity.
Really good to hear that it’s much faster than what FCA is claiming. It was nearly impossible to hit the claimed 1/4 times for the Demon from just about everyone, so FCA saying this only ran 0-60 in 4.5 made me question that time.
“The truck produces 702 horsepower and 650 lbs-ft of torque. It’s going to be quick. With a claimed 0-60 in 4.5 seconds”
You were the first person I thought of when I saw this headline.
JD Power is a fucking joke.
Tom, what I’m most curious about is how the hell an engine blew on a Toyota product with only 130k on it. That 3.5 is considered to be pretty bulletproof aside from an old recall for an oil tube or something of that nature. When the tube ruptures it spills out all of the oil in short order.
Agree.
Again, your handle is entirely appropriate for that comment.
That’s no different than any vehicle in this segment. In the DC Metro area I see plenty of clapped out, slammed E92s with straight pipes.
Well it is made by the same company that brought us the current Camaro. I’ve never driven a vehicle with worse visibility, it’s like sitting in a pillbox.
“Not to mention that it’ll be assembled by people who actually know how to build a car”
The price isn’t way over the top, but I don’t like the yellow and I can’t stand chrome anything.
Kia Niro is a great suggestion or a CR-V.
A HD pickup with a crew cab and an 8ft bed is the size of an aircraft carrier. Parking an aircraft carrier anywhere is difficult.