Depends on your definition of “published”. I’m not in media and never saw the list, and it took me about 2 seconds to find.

How do you define “published”?

Yeah, it’s so unlike Gawker to humiliate private citizens by publicly publishing their private emails.

That was the Darquezeiest pick-6 I’ve ever seen. 

2 for under 30 k. They were probably just copies.

Good link, thanks. And I agree with your assessment - there is no way on Earth that (for example) in 2006 the guy who is 57 seconds behind the (disqualified for doping) winner is clean. 21 stages, 2300 miles, a 57 second difference...but one guy is clean and the other isn’t? No fucking way.

Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous.

Or Pierre Omidyar, eBay founder who employs some ex-Gawker folks. He’s just as bad as the Koch brothers...right?

Be serious - what are the odds a middle aged Jewish guy in the media would be involved in all these sexual harassment scandals?

You ought to look at the list of most followed Instagram accounts. How many of them are athletes other than soccer players?

Can I just read Minnie Driver’s take and assume Matt said the opposite?

Group A is the group of “Death To Homosexuals”.

Absolutely. There is no reason, for example, to revisit the allegations of Al Gore sexually harassing masseuses - that was reported by some untrustworthy website anyway.

That’s a damnable lie!

What kind of work do you do?

IOW Stephen A. Smith exactly as he is now but with a bruise from the bat.

And then, a worker in a black t-shirt named Antonio Hoover looked up from his cell phone

You mean the Gizmodo Pouty Crybabies Sitting Their On Asses Until The One Year Prohibition On Firing Ex-Gawker Employees Expires Project Unit?

.

That fight was with a man, so the Cowboys won’t be interested.