slaybelle
Slay Belle
slaybelle

I believe it was on the Facebook page. And totally in keeping with everything that was on the original show and those 'never before aired' scenes from the recent episode. If shelf staple gnocci is her 'own cooking' then plating someone else's cake up and serving it counts as her own baking.

I assist in running interference on the mainpage trolls, but I can not directly delete them. I am still listed as a contact for comments on the about page and anyone is welcome to send me issues. I'll forward them to the correct party to deal with.

It wasn't on Nightmares. I've seen that episode several times.

The internet buzz was that they purchased the baking from elsewhere. There were no baking facilities that we saw in their kitchen and the show suspiciously spent zero time talking about it, so I don't think she makes them. How could she possibly have time to bake that many cakes/pies, etc every day and be the sole

There's also the "Mirror, Mirror" movie and it's sequels, "Mirror, Mirror 2 -4" that I immediately thought of when I saw this trailer. I quite liked the first one.

Gawker does not ban by IP unfortunately. Just email the mods (which, actually, is me).

To be fair, at least they knew the boat sank.

I think a point 4 could be added: It's not a spoiler if it's a historical event.

We moved overseas about six months ago and one of the things all three of us have noticed is that advertising is so much more effective on us now. It's completely because we have no ties to any local products and no ideas on what we should be buying, so the ads are pretty much the only way we find out about things.

You can comment and read any thread in GT even without posting rights. Several people host open threads that you can jump in at any time.

But the spin off isn't about The Mother. It's an entirely new cast.

My mother's and her sisters (there's three of them) all married Davids. Sometimes it did get confusing.

Is this a new thing? When my parents got married (my mom's second marriage, so I was present for it), they held the rehearsal dinner in a converted train car restaurant. A couple of different restaurants have gone in there over the years — now it's a Subway.

I don't think that we're going to come to agreement on this, but I think you put too much emphasis on the chip and not enough on the actual soul issue, which the show underlines as the most important.

Jane Espenson admitted the scene was written to manipulate the audience. It was Marti Noxon's idea and Ms. Espenson was against it for, well, because she's a person with sense. I recall her relaying an exchange where she basically tried talking Marti Noxon out of it. However Joss Whedon had largely handed the reigns

Unlike Angelus, however, Spike had been domesticated. The chip in his brain which prevented him from harming humans forced him to consider how he interacted with people, and when the chip stopped working he realized making the conscious choice to not harm was more advantageous.

I think that's mostly correct, but Spike's an interesting case because he seems to be the only vampire who can retain the ability to love — The Judge even remarks on it in season 2, saying they (Dru & Spike) stink of humanity. He's also a bit of a romanticist and is capable of acts of great sacrifice (see his bargain

Well, there's this:

No, Spike did not have his soul when he tried to rape Buffy. That was the whole point of him leaving and putting himself through the trials to get it back, because he could play at being a 'man' — and did it sometimes convincingly — but without his soul, he was still a monster. If you think that Angelus isn't the

She was charged with assault for a different episode of hitting her and threatening her with knives. Anyone who 'slips up' enough to hit her kid when there's a camera rolling on her is probably capable of much worse when the cameras are off.