slaw1
slaw
slaw1

I don’t see the appeal of peeping on either real or virtual women without consent, but I’m having a hard time coming up with an explanation as to why taking an upskirt photo in some future version of GTA would be more objectionable than shooting that same person in the face.

Man, I must have missed that day in history class when they talked about invincible flamethrower-wielding infantry.

“This is because the key to the authentication isn’t the device itself, but rather information stored on the device which could in theory be copied by an attacker.”

Welp, time to reset the counter.

So it turns out that giving away free stuff forever is not a viable business model. Qué sopresa.

If you’d be spending $2,000 in 3 months anyways—including the price of the phone—and know the link for the application for the AT&T Access More card, there is absolutely such a thing as a free iPhone 7.

From what I’ve heard, the only people who avoided 5/24 applied in person on Sunday or online last Monday when the test link was accidentally put up.

From what I’ve heard, the only people who avoided 5/24 applied in person on Sunday or online last Monday when the

Now playing

I understand quite well what I linked to; my mistake was in pasting the wrong link.

but it will not automatically enter an airport’s flight pattern for landing, nor line up with a runway, or land automatically.

Oh, I agree. Certainly more nuanced than “things are different”.

In Japan, per tradition wives are in charge of household finances.

You’re the one who needs to calm down a bit. It was clearly a joke; even more so if you bothered to watch the GIF, much less the clip in the tweet.

Your phone is hitting GPS, screen, and rear camera all at the same time. Claiming 8 hours of battery life under normal conditions means nothing. Try recording video at full resolution and have Google Maps running in the background and report back. And even that will still use less power because smartphones have

training your hair to get less oily by washing it less is a myth according to an actual dermatologist. If you have an oily scalp, you have an oily scalp. (As an amateur hair-haver, I disagree. I made the transition to washing less, which was harrowing, but worth the journey.)

Now playing

In your case that’s covered under the ban on “Eating foods or in a manner that might inflict harm upon yourself or lead to vomiting.”

Neither Judaism nor Islam have proscriptions against non-believers eating pork.

You say they MUST put the material back up if a counterclaim is filed, but that isn’t completely true either.

If she’s incapable of understanding that anime is purely a medium—if she refuses to watch, say, My Neighbor Totoro, Dennou Coil, Princess Jellyfish, or Wandering Son—and is rejecting all of it because of Akira, you have significantly bigger problems than her not wanting to watch anime.

In reality, the only party that has the say when the game is put back up is Valve, and they are stuck in the legal pothole of DMCA (damned if you do, sued if you don’t).

The issue isn’t whp vs bhp, it’s the fact that the motors themselves never even come close to a combined 691 hp of output. At peak, the motors draw just shy of 560 hp worth of electricity. So unless the motors are somehow producing an output greater than input, yeah, that’s not how this works.