slaw1
slaw
slaw1

I’m not sure I would call this “money you’ll make” so much as ““money” you’ll recoup”.

Business suicide is a bit of a stretch.

1. Turn on airplane mode.

Took them long enough.

You can be sure that I won’t take it for granite.

They do look very gneiss...

Depends on if you’re a prescriptivist or a descriptivist.

Poe’s law.

Attacking Brussels, Belgium seems kind of like attacking middle town America.

Might as well be theft is not the same as theft. That is my point.

Actually piracy, which involves robbery and/or criminal violence at sea, never falls under “theft of services.” Also, I never claimed that copyright infringement is the same thing as theft of service; I very specifically said “no different in concept” and was addressing the image that was mindlessly copied and pasted.

Whoever made this stupid infographic clearly never heard of the legal term “theft of services”, and apparently neither have you. It’s no different in concept from fare evasion, which is the classic case of theft of service.

If a user chooses to build and sign the app themselves, then that user will have broken said agreement. What a user chooses to do with his or her own account is none of f.lux’s business. And if f.lux had broken the developer agreement on their own, well, certainly whatever penalties that would apply to breaking such

Given iOS core structure please explain how you would code this app with jail breaking or having Apple do it.

The Enterprise Edition fails to fix many of the things wrong with the first Glass—privacy concerns,

Didn’t want to burn him that much. But yes, you’re right. Whoops.

There’s a difference between adding features that may or may not be copied and pulling developers’ apps, or even straight up demanding that they not release apps that don’t even need jailbreaking to install.

As strong as girders that held up a building that survived a truck bomb and required a mostly-fueled 737s to take down? I’d say there’s nothing to worry about... unless your mom gets up there.