slackware1125
Slackware1125
slackware1125

Is it really that bad? I can’t understand why someone would decline a free game, even if they were just going to hate-play it. Eh, maybe I’ll buy it if it’s not too expensive.

It’s pretty delusional and egotistical of Zoe Quinn if she honestly believed this was a reference to her. That’s a serious victim complex she’s got going on.

I'm really not liking this design. I get that he's going for a more radiation damaged, keloid scarred look but so far it just looks like kind of like a bad drawing brought to life. Something like that, anyway. I guess that's the idea behind it; this is a warped, messed up version of him that's supposed to look

Who gets to decide what’s considered crappy or deserving of success, though? That’s the argument JustUsBabe seems to be making. The article seems to say it’s okay when Amy Winehouse did it because the author liked her music. She doesn’t like Meghan Trainor, though, so it’s wrong and she doesn’t deserve success. It’s

So if Emilia Clarke says she doesn’t want to do nudity on the show is it okay for me to say, “She’s a sex symbol with an amazing career on a hot show! Get over it and take your shirt off!” I suspect I would be called a misogynist and hear some stuff about patriarchy and objectifying women. So I think we’ve found the

Why is everybody here giving Will Arnett crap for dating a bunch of young women? Are we now against people being able to have consensual sex with whoever they want? Or is it only slut-shaming when it’s against women? I can never keep up with these rules. And why does he seem like a douche but Megan Fox of all people

They were married and had kids. If that's dodging a bullet I'd hate to see what would have happened if she got hit.

Exactly. I was going to make that same comparison. They both have great ideas but they need to have someone who will tell them when something isn’t working. I feel like they got so successful that people are afraid to say no to them.

That made me like Jim Sterling a bit. He's right. Molyneux seems like a great idea man but he needs people to rein him in and make those ideas work in a realistic manner. I feel like he convinces himself with his own hype and then is genuinely upset when the finished product is a bit of a mess. He just never learns

Was it really all that good, though? It could be enjoyable at times but it always felt underbaked. Every moment promised so much more than it delivered and everything seemed like it was done better in other games. Molyneux always seemed more interested in getting everything in there rather than focusing on perfecting

Nobody wins here. People should ignore Nicole Arbour, nobody should ever listen to Freelee, I don't know who Vegan Gains is but he seems like a douche... Sorsha seems okay, though. They should have just ignored her since she's obviously just a shit disturber. Instead they gave her the attention she wanted and made

That's true of almost any crime, though. It's up to the accuser to prove a crime was committed and it's the role of the accused to refute that. Yeah, it's horrible but we can't just throw people in jail or otherwise penalize them based on what someone says and nfortunately this whole case is he said/she said right

For some reason the first part of my comment was cut off. I questioned how pre-ordering is harmful or supports shady business practices. It gauges demand for the game and in most cases a person is not on the hook to pay anything so it's no different than buying it day one except you don't have to worry about it being

And how is liking the trailer in any way a harmful or wrong opinion? That doesn’t make any sense. You don’t like it, fine, but who cares if other people do? It causes zero issues. There is literally no harm to be found and someone enjoying something harmless, regardless of its quality, is not wrong.

Actually it’s hard NOT to notice patterns, even if they don’t exist. It’s why people see faces in toast or hear voices in static. We sometimes try to make things fit a predicted model in order to make sense of them. In this case you’re seeing a lot of violence and calling it misogyny because it was perpetrated against

It's also on sale on Steam for the moment, along with the DLC. I think it's even cheaper than buying it from Amazon so for people still deciding you might want to look into that.

It's also on sale on Steam for the moment, along with the DLC. I think it's even cheaper than buying it from Amazon

I don’t think it’s really inconsistent with her character, though. She pretty clearly has no real issue with the adventuring and exploration but the criminal stuff puts her off. That was why she broke up with him; he took unnecessary risks, broke the law, crossed people he shouldn’t have and generally risked his and

Like you said, though, he thought he was saving Sam’s life. We know Elena well enough by now to know that she would understand. He had no reason to lie to her over that. She’d be confused at first but she’d understand and support him in this. I think he lied because he knew she’d be able to tell he was excited about

At the end of the third game and this one it was shown that Nate was perfectly willing to try to change for her. Why wasn’t it an issue then? Besides, Elena didn’t change for him. At the end she acknowledged that she missed the adventure and excitement, too, and that they would always have trouble if they tried to

I feel like you’re blaming Sam for Nate’s choices. Nate chose to go with Sam, he chose to lie to Elena, he chose not to follow her when she found out, etc. Sam lied to persuade Nate but Nate was also using all that as an excuse to go on another adventure. He tells Sam he’s done it before and Elena tells him that he’s