slackware1125
Slackware1125
slackware1125

Not even remotely what he said. Angry ranting is a solid indication that the ranter isn't capable of rational, intelligent thought. Being disappointed by something and expressing that disappointment in a calm, constructive manner is fine. Angry ranting is just a way to get attention while being a whiny douche bag. If

So Dragon Age and Mass Effect 2 were bad games? Two of the most well regarded games of the past decade aren't good to you? EA is far from a blight on the industry. They're no different than every other large publishing company except that people choose to hate them because reasons.

Wow! Rational and intelligent. You do realize this is the Internet, right? haha!

People who have stock in EA or work there? People who don't have an irrational hatred of EA based on the ramblings of grumpy, borderline illiterate hate spewers? People who are interested in the news related to the video game industry?

Part of me thinks this should be offensive. The rest of me was too busy laughing to care.

Having read it, I actually find I disagree somewhat. The trouble comes not from wanting to be fully human but from wanting to transcend humanity or stand apart from it. Anakin is denied the right to be fully human because of the Jedi teachings and then, when faced with losing those he loves, is basically politely told

Quality can also be subjective. I find the 360 UI a complicated mess at the best of times and the PS3 dashboard incredibly smooth and user friendly. I suppose it could just be that I'm more used to the PS3 interface but I just find everything organized better. I have issues with it, too, don't get me wrong but nowhere

Ah, I thought you meant that it was the space marines doing all the killing. I see what you mean now. I guess I can see that. And Alien Resurrection... I don't know, it's not a bad movie up until the weird human/Xenomorph hybrid thing. I don't know if that was different in the script or not and it wasn't a bad idea

Personal opinion aside, how can you find Alien Resurrection better than Aliens? From a purely objective standpoint Aliens is the far superior movie. Not that I think Resurrection was a horrible movie but it was weak in comparison.

Isn't Rockstar already working on a game called Agent? I completely forgot about that game until this article. I wonder what happened to it...

There was never really a legitimate threat of a lawsuit. I believe it did go before a judge but it was quickly shot down. I know you could be referring to that but I don't think anybody seriously thought it would happen to the point that it was a "legitimate threat."

I don't think Fox DOES care. It's Bryan Singer that's the problem. First Class was apparently supposed to be just a full-on reboot but Bryan Singer was involved and added in nods to the X-Men movies he made. Even then it wasn't a big deal because it basically amounted to Mystique's appearance and Wolverine's cameo but

Whether or not the mediocrity should have been there(yeah, okay, it shouldn't) doesn't change the fact that mediocre and terrible are separated by a wide gulf. The backlash against it was taken to a ridiculous extreme, and the OP posting that people who didn't think it was terrible are "deluded Bioware fans" is kind

I think part of the problem is that if you're white and male there seems to be this automatic assumption that you're privileged. That's not an attack on anyone, just an observation. Being white and male does remove some obstacles, I have no doubt, but unfortunately many people of privilege created new obstacles to

Well you could argue that he didn't say that because the recording was meant for a specific audience and he was talking to them directly. If we're not part of that audience, he wasn't talking to us, and so I suppose what he said is out of context. I'm not saying that's the case, just that it's possible.

No offense but saying "gamers voiced concern over the game being too similar" is like saying there was a small fire aboard the Hindenburg. As for TESO, I hope it's good, although everything I've seen of it thus far looks to be fairly generic fantasy in appearance. That said I haven't been following it closely enough

The problem is that, according to the article, they had a vehicle and a weapon. They clearly weren't desperate since they apparently could afford the gas and insurance(the article says nothing about them being in trouble for not having insurance) and they were on their way to a butcher, whose services they presumably

Why would I not? Taken in context it's clear I'm exaggerating and that I don't seriously believe the more extreme statements. I would think a more important question is will you accept responsibility for your opinion if you're ever in a position where you need government help? Will you re-evaluate what you said and