It’s not uncommon for doors to be inoperable after an impact. This goes for all kinds of doors - even normal manual ones.
It’s not uncommon for doors to be inoperable after an impact. This goes for all kinds of doors - even normal manual ones.
Oh no. Did this movie upset your precious feelings? Because Japanese themselves, the creators of the original and the whole world is pretty much happy with this. Glad you got your 15 minutes though. Surely you will sleep better tonight.
So a chinese actress, an american chinese actress or another chinese actress. To play the part of a japansese character? Sure.
Meanwhile in Japan
Last I heard, both Masamune Shirow, and Mamoru Oshii are really liking what they’re doing. When the series creator, and the director of the original movie are both digging it, they must be doing something right.
#mandatory
He’s intelligent, popular, and didn’t have to pay Hulk Hogan tens of millions of dollars.
Yeah, I don’t get it either. What’s intrinsically wrong with what he’s doing? part of his thing is finding out new information and facts that improve your knowledge. Wikipedia is a pretty good place for that, all things considered.
On the other hand, you’re bloggers who “Spend the Day Ripping Lines From Reddit,” so let’s call it even.
So what? The guy make good original tweets using facts sourced from wikipedia, the biggest crowdsourced encyclopedia that everyone uses, again what’s the big deal with this?
Hm. Not too sure what the problem is. You can absolutely source your tweets to Wikipedia, because they’re tweets, not academic papers.
Alex Cranz>Assassin_Kensei
I’m a big fan of Gizmodo but I do not enjoy the perspective of this article. Is there a way to un-follow just your writing on this website but still receive the rest of the feed?
Seriously that’s your response? I don’t think it’s really overly sexist or homophobic either, juvenile and inappropriate for a company trying to move into the professionals market. But while we are on the topic, I also feel bad for anyone who had to be romantically involved with you, because you’re ugly.
Ad hominem and lame response. But that’s ok since Gawker Media is just a blogging platform and not a actually journalism, except when you all decide it is.
Gizmodos writing staff is no better than Razor
I am so sorry that you felt the need to belittle someone who simply disagreed with you and asked for a clarification on the reasoning behind your statement. Not a very professional way to approach a reply. If anything it’s as juvenile as the Razer tweet.
I’m afraid you’re the only one that sees it that way.
Beyond his poor argument which managed to be both homophobic and sexist, could you explain how making a fellatio joke is, on it’s face, homophobic or sexist?