Voted NP; Christmas came early!
Skipp
skipp
Yeah, like, as Rob said, maybe the parts weren’t available any longer, but still...
YEAH BUT WHAT IF IT LOOKED LESS LIKE A FERRARI AND MORE LIKE A NISSAN WITH A BOOMBOX HANDLE ON THE BACK?!?!?///////
Before you vote CP, you need to know why - behold, the car in its original, beautiful form:
Now playing
#GOALS
I see what they were trying to do... to paraphrase Jeremy Clarkson, the profile is like somebody described a Range Rover over the phone.
“I want a fun car that comfortably seats 3 adults, but I hate SUVs/trucks. Something fresh & exciting” -Me
This charge is what you call a “red flag”; like, a company that thinks it’s appropriate to charge $80/year for access to a basic function like this can’t be trusted to make reasonable decisions elsewhere.
Now playing
ｔｈｅｒｅ＇ｓ ｎｏ ｓｕｃｈ ｔｈｉｎｇ ａｓ ｔｏｏ ＲＡＤＷＯＯＤ
Half pronouns question, half story question (not trying to be an asshole or anything):
lol it pisses me off so much seeing people do this
“Kyle Smith is critic-at-large at National Review”
Just saw the Tesla truck.
Charitably, it looks shit.
Assuming the two 0's at the end are typos, NP!
It’s funny you should say that; I spent all of September trying to get a Leaf for my mother in law (she had a Leaf with a lease ending) and all of the Nissan dealerships just plain fucking sucked. Not a one of them was within $75 of the national lease offer from the manufacturer, not a one of them answered any of the…
Is there something I’m missing about why the price is so high?
Is it like the G-O editors missing comments on the autoplay content? We can at least help with that, by emailing g-omediafeedback@googlegroups.com .
CP for the car and the autoplay content.
The autoplay videos are not just infuriating, but there seems to be a severe recency bias that means that even if I were interested in watching a video once, I’ll be seeing the same 2-3 seconds of an intro several times a day for a month.
Look, new media bros, I get that there’s money in places like YouTube, but like-…