To your last point, I would be inclined to agree with you in general principle, as I think that it is typically done as some sort of pandering gimmick. (I’m looking at you, Ghostbusters.) However, for this particular property, I see some potential of having contemporary, thematic relevance if done with some…

Hey man, as long as there’s one loser out there with a reflexively contrarian opinion and an internet connection, there’s always “backlash” that needs to be challenged for very compelling reasons that are absolutely not just about pandering and self-congratulation.

I agree. Try as much as you want to make something like this gross, it’s probably just based in nostalgia for a simpler time when she was an innocent little toddler, and her body was super tight.

That’s quite a coincidence, because I’m drinking blood out of a human skull right now, and sometimes a face is called a “mug.”

“...about as pure a manifestation of human evil as can be imagined.”

Wake up, sheeple! The reason they did not find a DNA match is because the corpse they actually exhumed was Andy Kaufman. He and Sal had this stunt cooked up all along.

Unless Kinja cut “for a training montage in a Kickboxer film” from your first sentence, I don’t think anybody else was thinking it.

I’m confused. So whose sports team won the National Championship?

First off, it says in his follow-up that police were already present in the area and he just mentioned it to them. It wasn’t him being stolen from, so he would not be the one pressing charges and no report I imagine was filed at all.

I was exactly the age and exactly the mentality that would ostensibly put me right in the sweet spot, but... meh. I watched some of it, I admired some of it, but it always seemed a little undercooked and a little too pleased with itself. I was already watching Python and Letterman and I didn’t have much use for…

“Others have pointed out that Llamas was openly admitting to diverting first responder resources, which might otherwise be used for rescuing people stranded in their homes, to making sure no one takes soon-to-be-rotting food.”

A barely remembered, hardly beloved property with a title that everybody is going to call out as a quaint time capsule of its era that was essentially just a Laugh-in rip-off for kids in the first place? Aside from the sliming, what are you even hinging any meaningful brand association on?

Gone with the Wind has committed the unpardonable sin in retrospect of being a story that contains slavery that is not also about slavery.

Good for you, Google. I’m sure ‘depressed’ is a highly lucrative marketing identity.

Interestingly as the day progresses and posts written more recently than yours and mine reach approval, it seem the most consistent characteristic shared by comments that remain in “pending” status is being in any way remotely critical.

Good job, Alamo Drafthouse. I guess I get what point you’re trying to make, but it reads to me more like you’ve conflated gender identity as just another instance of cosplay.