Great. Can we stop now with the Clinton of it all. Who gives a shit about that asshole.
Great. Can we stop now with the Clinton of it all. Who gives a shit about that asshole.
Ummm... Ok. Was the platform the same? You know what I don’t even care. I could link you to an article with direct quotes from candidates and sources detailing many, many instances of the democratic party shutting out progressive candidates. I won’t because it’s in the Intercept, so…
So... so what. What does that have to do with the attitude of the dems toward progressive candidates? Are you saying that this one example is representative of something? Because, buddy, let me tell you that it’s not.
What does this anecdote have to do with anything that I wrote?
Like Nader? Can’t vote for him, though, right? Because then you’re a SPOILER. If you try to work within the party: NOT A DEMOCRAT. Face it, bruh, the dems hate the left. They hate the left more than they hate trump.
Zing!
He totally said that while he was being treated for syphilis.
*Ahem* PRESENT BOLD POLICIES THAT WILL MATERIALLY HELP PEOPLE INSTEAD OF FOCUSING ON HOW BAD THE REPUBLICANS ARE. Instead of spending the MILLIONS of dollars on this fucking stupid campaign that is designed to fail, why not present a real alternative? How about Medicare For All? Or No More Billionaires? Or 100%…
Sorry, I wasn’t clear. The term “Fake News” was used way before trump started using it by liberals to describe crazy right wing nonsense. I think obama used it waaaay before trump put it in his lexicon.
Not only sorely lacking but they tend to backfire spectacularly. See: Fake News.
They wouldn’t land those punches anyway. This is an attempt to deflect away from their consistent legislative cowardice and abject failure. “See! We’re totally doing stuff by doing stuff!”
I cannot wait for the triumphant return of DANGEROUS DONALD.
Obama was called “deporter in chief” because he deported many, many more people than trump has. That’s not the fault of the left, brosef. The wall, which is a major symbolic victory for trump should not be funded. Despite all the protestations of “it’s meaningless” it does mean something. Both the massive financial…
The only way I see this having any effect at all is if someone disparages trump’s penis. Then you’ll really see the shit hit the fan. He’ll HAVE to respond. That, right there, is where we are in american politics.
“Very Stable Penis”
She was a Goldwater Girl, bro. What are you even talking about.
Excellent point.
Andrew Zimmern?
I remember reading Favreau and he said something like “we need republicans to keep government spending in check.” Republicans have deficit spent since FUCKING REAGAN and we need them to keep spending under control? I mean, that lack of knowledge exhibited by a person who literal put words into the mouth of a sitting…
Ha! Damn.