You’re wrong, and you’re also right. They tried splitting the third and last book into two movies as was the style at the time and never made the fourth movie, the part 2. There is a fourth book, but it’s a collection of (I think prequel?) shorts and I doubt there was much of an intention of adapting any of it.

Fourth AND fifth. Remember, the last book gets two movies with awful pacing issues for, let’s say, “accounting purposes.”

Jenkins, a few years later: “I have never seen it, but by all accounts it is terrible. However, I have seen the house that it built, and it is terrific.”

Two angels (Jessica Wylde & Tracey Adams) are sent back to Earth to provide some sexual satisfaction to the mortal humans.”

“I knew it was you, Zazu. You broke my heart.”

Not to defend the OP but the Fantastic Beast movies failed for more reason then just Rowlings shitty opinions. Harry Potter land in Universal is still a huge money maker as well. It points to the fact that many people either don’t know her views, don’t care(or agree) with her views or have opted to choose to…

So, do they have to sleep with him again? I skipped law school exams.

we are probably one of the most obnoxious fan bases

Once I commented online that I thought a new Taylor Swift song was “pretty good.” Then I mentioned a few of her earlier songs that I also liked.

“I’ve watched episodes”

I’ve watched a couple of the more recent episodes. Good lord, it deserves all the hate you can give it.

I feel like the things Seinfeld is saying in the interview are pretty perceptive. Schimkowitz even seems to largely agree with much of it. So why be so pissy about it all?

There’s a Monty Python sketch where a prisoner is going to be executed. A telegram comes in just in time, but it says the execution has been “candelled”. The prisoner is all “clearly that’s a typo for “cancelled” and the guards are like “no it probably just means we should light candles, right?”.

I’d prefer Eric Idle to personally, but I’ll take either of them. The Pythons have neatly divided themselves into ‘already dead’, ‘determined to destroy their legacy on the way out’, and ‘must be protected at all costs’.

Mynd you, møøse bites Kan be pretti nasti...

Any human artist who made these sort of basic mistakes would be told to try again, if not outright fired.

Came to say the exact same thing! The overall slickness of Doctor Who from Eccelston-onward (I realize it’s gotten even slicker in recent years) has kept me at an arm’s length from it, even as I thought the actors portraying the Doctor have been uniformly excellent.

Exactly, I like my Doctor Who cheap and silly. I want to see the same quarry as every other planet. I want the aliens to be strangely wearing the same costumes as whatever big budget historical drama the BBC in the next studio over(Oh look, its the Space Romans, next week its the Space Victorians).  

Yep, basically when BBC America got the show and we got same day releases in the US finally it was super big. That was right around the 50th anniversary

I get the thought process, but the low budget feel is a part of the reason why people like Who.  It is similar to modern Trek for me.  Yes, it looks great but I miss the feeling of stuff like TNG and DS9.