sketcher0204
Sketcher0204
sketcher0204

I’ve read that Snyder does have a plan to deal with level of destruction in MoS. It’s actually a major plot point in BvS. Supposedly, the destruction is why half the world hates Superman and wants him gone. At the time, Man of Steel seemed like just another mindless, destruction movie for the sake of action. But it

Your question had nothing to do with my point. If you actually got my point instead of playing semantics, you wouldn’t have asked it in the first place.

Exactly. Too many people are viewing this as a black and white issue. He’s either a hero or a traitor. Honestly, he’s a little of both. I would have no problem with Snowden if he only released information about an illegal government program. But that’s not all he did. He released a shit ton of classified information

It’s called a metaphor, dumbass. I’m not comparing what he did to murder. I’m saying you can’t pardon someone who did something bad, just because he did something good in the process.

It doesn’t matter who he gave it to. What matters is he gave it to people who should not have had it. Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad the info about the NSA was released, but there was way too much additional info that should not have gotten out. He essentially bombed an entire town to kill a few terrorists. Sure, it’s a

You can’t “opt” in for the passcode. It’s required if you decide to use TouchID in case TouchID doesn’t work.

Eh, it’s not that bad. It takes me less than 10 seconds to see if an email is pertinent to me. I get a notification, swipe to my email desktop to quickly check, then get back to work.

That won’t work at my job. I usually get emails with 30+ people cc’d and the emails usually includes an attachment that at least 20 of them need to get their part of the project done. Ignoring those emails would get me fired.

Because HBO charges a premium to watch their content. While you’re paying less than a dollar for each basic cable channel, you’re paying $10+ for HBO.

I brought up that exact point in my comment.

Considering their chief of advertising just left the company over Apple’s preference for privacy over data mining, it’s really not smoke and mirrors. I’m not saying they don’t utilize data, and they never claimed that they don’t. But their services utilizes data stored locally on your device, not on Apple’s servers.

I don’t know if you’d consider the Ninja Turtles to be superhero movies, but I’d put the first film in the top ten. I love that movie just as much today as I did in the early 90’s. The two sequels were terrible, though.

Easier to regulate, for one. It ensures (to a point) that only the people who genuenly can’t afford internet use it rather than just anyone who wants free internet. It also helps to make sure the people using it are actually using it for things like homework or finding jobs rather than just sitting at home and playing

I don’t necessarily agree with the OP, but your response is just as ridiculous in the opposite extreme. There was a time where I couldn’t afford internet. Hell, I was barely keeping the lights on in my apartment. I would go to the local library to apply for jobs from their computers.

The iPod Nano is still a great product for people who just want a simple music player. Especially for use in the gym when you just want to strap something small to your waist or arm.

Demand. iPods don’t sell nearly as well as iPhones so the keep they cost low to attract customers. Hardware/manufacturing costs are only part of what factors into the cost of a product.

If you have iCloud Music Library turned on in your settings on both devices, it should do it automatically.

This is the only thing I really have a problem with in Apple Music. There should just be a button at the top of your songs list to automatically start shuffling your songs. I shouldn’t have to select a song first, then hit shuffle in the mini player.

“Why Asphalt and concrete are the perfect road materials.”

I didn’t say anything about this particular idea. I agree this is likely not a good solution. I’m responding to the idea that asphalt is good enough to not need to work on new ideas.