skellington187
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
skellington187

Almost what I said right after the 2016 election, and still applies sometimes:

All I have to say right now is, frankly, it’s amazing to me that WYTS 2019 has been going on for over a week now and still hasn’t gotten to Cleveland

“and the U.S. had already collapsed”

Hawaiian pizza tastes better and is cheaper

I think we can all agree that Cubans are the ultimate sandwich...maybe tied with Monte Cristos

“Eating pineapple pizza is just unpatriotic now and should be considered treason” 

One slice by itself? No

Are...are you me from some other universe?

“If ‘it’ is a single-payer healthcare system passing both chambers of the legislature that charts out a four-year transition to what we have now to that, it won’t be difficult. It will be impossible” 

Or called a troll and responded to with dumbass gifs

Apparently bringing up legitimate issues to this person counts as trolling, they did it to me as well

Conceded, you’re not acting in bad faith. It’s just that things like this, “Hahahaha! Are you serious? Jesus...” and “It’s, excuse my French, fucking insane” make it seem that way

“I do think every american has a right to healthcare”

In thinking about it this all just seems like a bad faith ploy to obfuscate my original point

1. I didn’t say “non-profit” I said “not for-profit”, they’re different things legally speaking

“Everyone would be ‘on’ Medicare For All”

My question would be, though, will it actually do anything or make a noticeable difference? This lady says she didn’t know because “I’ve mainly listened to conservative news and I hadn’t heard anything negative about that report.” Right-wing reporting isn’t going to be any different with this

Maybe I’m just crazy, that’s always a possibility *shrug*

Isn’t this also pretty much what a bunch of us were saying when the writers were screaming for him to testify, that it wouldn’t really move the needle?

“The federal government expanding a currently existing federal health insurance program which has already proven to be constitutionally acceptable by (as a simplified description) changing the statutory language regarding who is eligible for the program so it encompasses all citizens, not just those currently eligible