Seriously?

Jose: Si, perra! IMANES!

Did they visit a restaurant called "The Chicken Brothers?"

Seems like the ending was mixing in some kind of symbolic, surreal, allegorical (insert other critique-y) stuff in the last episode that really deviated from how the show started. If their target audiences were philosophy and literature majors then I think they lost a bunch of us.

So if you criticize a show, it's because you wanted it to be something it wasn't? Maybe it just wasn't as good as you thought.

Haven't see Fargo, look forward to it. True Detective had some great moments but was ultimately disappointing. Mathew Mc's character was just too "out there."

One of my faves