As a person of non-color who nonetheless feels just as entitled as you to weigh in on candidates for public office, there is nothing I care less about than you using your race to ignorance-splain your piss-poor understanding of history.

Right? Nothing like 3 strikes laws that says you’re championing POC! Or welfare reform! Or bankruptcy reform!
The only idiotic thing about this narrative is that calling out POC and women who vote for her is somehow sacrocant, because there’s no way any of them could possibly be misinformed about her record.

Which is a shame, because out of the 3 groups Hillary has only ever really helped women, and even then only the well-off.

Don’t cut yourself on that edge, dear.

Then 10 years later, Al Queda did the same thing and found a bunch of our unexploded ordinance (that’s where most of the explosive for IED’s came from, actually. Between that and all the depleted uranium rounds, we really screwed ourselves over on the return.).

Saddamn had chemical munitions he built in the 80's, but were mostly destroyed in the first war. The stuff we found the second time was everything that was left, and it was useless junk (although still extremely toxic) by that point.
WMD’s in the sense that they could be used on large populations, and he used them…

Well, it’s because a great deal of the BLM protestors act like they’re the only ones who are actually subject to police brutality, and other races are completely ignorant of the state of affairs and have never been subjected to the same sort of thing. They also pick on people like Bernie Sanders out of sheer…

Working fine? Maybe for people who already had insurance, or those who live in lala land. In reality it’s end up being a giant clustufuck for quite a few people- and I’m not just talking about those in states who didn’t get expanded medicaid.

A bullshit sociological hypothesis does not a sound study make, and the studies that focus on this particular issue are full of some of the bulshittiest of bullshit.
You may like them, the academics who are forced to do “research” and thus come up with this absurd shit may like them (at least to some degree, I’m…

It’s like white male privlige; there might be plenty of us that are incredibly disadvanataged in life, but somewhere, somehow, we’ve benefited from our whiteness in a way that a non-white couldn’t possibly have done.

Holy crap, how many times does that stupid study have to be debunked before progressives stop using it? The most statistically rigorious studies place the pay gap at less than 10%, with 3% being considered accurate.

Or maybe he has a set of rules they’ve violated, and they will get their comeuppance.

If there were a 97% consensus that climate change was anthroprogenic, I would expect many scientists would have the good grace to blush when it’s been pointed out that there are other factors in play too (or perhaps you don’t understand the difference between a causative effect and a contributory one).
No, I didn’t…

Peer review does not place question, and as I said the meta-study is less reliable than other studies because they tend to shoehorn broad answers into narrow ones.
No self-respecting journal should be publishing self-reported polls like the one mentioned in the second half of the quote I pulled from the page you…

Thank you for making my exact point, by not reading the article you yourself posted. Here’s a quote:

“Cook’s study found that among over 4,000 studies that took a position on man-made climate change, 97.1 percent “endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global phase” and 97.2 of 1,300 authors who…

It’s no secret that that 97% figure you’ve quoted is based on a piss-poor survey that used self reporting. That’s the equivalent of an online opinion poll, and it means bumpkis. If you want to challenge secpticts, try using sound science instead of thuroughly debunked talking points.

You should stop trying to science, you’re terrible at it.

Welp, the important thing is that you believe in... something? I guess? No I don’t have to admit it’s getting better, there are plenty of things getting worse. History is not a story of continual ascendancy.

Actually, passenger cars are NOT a significant source of GHG’s or other harmful emissions. The major contributors are power generation (hello Mr. Electric Car Driver) and industry.

Not even close. Peak oil has been disproven repeatedly, and trying to use different words to say “peak oil” doesn’t make you look any smarter.