The point is that your assertion that you’ve “never seen” something on your Facebook feed is a) unverifiable but also b) almost certainly false. Your brain filters an unfathomable amount of information every day and rejects almost all of it without it ever reaching your conscious perception. The idea that you are…

What’s your explanation for why not a single person has EVER found a shred of proof when they actually study the issue? You’re also suggesting that thousands of employees at these companies have perfectly kept a secret about massively illegal behavior at these companies for a decade or more. Why would they do that? You…

There are more answers than just “you search for more than you think you do” to explain eerie ad appearances. I expect people will also reject these explanations, even though there’s never been even a single instance of a substantiated claim of “listening” advertising:

But facts don’t matter to some people, they just believe whatever dumb shit they want to believe.

Wait. So, do you work for Tesla, or have your years of pro-Tesla comments on Jalopnik just been for fun?

“Ok. Guilty or not. The person still has the right to ask for a lawyer.”

That’s what I said, and it says exactly what I meant it to say. You can take the evening to re-read it and compare it to what you said. Then you can report back when you identify the difference.

We’re a pattern seeking species; a big part of our intelligence is recognising things that connect to other things and making conclusions about that. Very useful when looking for camouflaged predators, but it can kick into overdrive and suddenly coincidences look like red flags.

America’s healthcare system is garbage.

I imagine it’s pretty dystopic if you have to declare bankruptcy and can’t afford to continue cancer treatments or some other health related nightmare.

Stockholm is calling. They want their syndrome back.

“Normally, it’ll cost you $16 for 30 minutes of game time (not even enough to squeeze in a round of Overwatch comp), $26 for up to an hour, and $46 for the entire day.”

Sure.

Am I the only person who doesn’t give a fuck about the sexual nature of this and is just sad about the waste this will cause?

Well, the article itself mentions fucking it. Which I suppose could be as reference to one of the other orfices used for that action, but probably not.

And you’d be fucking wrong.

People confuse a slippery slope fallacy (because it is) with the simple changing of public sentiment. The truth is, there is no perfect anything and there will always be people who dislike change.

Humans adapt and move on and if the majority of people are happy with it, then its nbd. If enough people are unhappy it is…

Ok good. I see people on here rail on backup cameras as being a nanny device. Those people are not serious adults and I treat them accordingly. Glad you aren’t one.

“We need a white guy who’s mere presence suggests that everything has gone completely to hell and that our main character has made terrible choices, can the casting director get someone like that?”

The speed limits in my residential area seem fine. So just fix the speed limits on your roads. Agree about the highway though. You would need to probably bump those up a little.