sirmeili
SirMeili
sirmeili

There is nothing wrong with what she did. The fact that certain emails were deemed classified after the fact doesn’t make what she did wrong. Was it ill advised? Maybe with hindsight, but nothing wrong with it at the time.

Her intention for the email server was to only have non-classified emails go through it.

Since we

I mean, until the smoke kills them, amirite? Most people in building fires die from smoke inhalation before they die of the actual fire.

She may be able to return it, but likely it will just be thrown away. Most grocery stores won’t put returned food back on the shelves. There is too much risk involved that you could have tampered wiht the food.

Better option: Donate it to a homeless food kitchen.

so the processor die is bigger than before. So they didn’t take away space from p cores for e cores. They added space to account for the e cores.

I have no issue if my processor is a bit more energy efficient for when I”m just doing mundane tasks like browsing.

Was that 2 Trillion meant for the sole purpose of eradicating hunger? I doubt it was. That 2 Trillion was meant for to help keep funding for the military, lets not be naive. Our involvement in the middle east has very rarely had anything to do with helping the actual people over there. It’s an excuse to keep funneling

And money could help further that goal.

The very idea that most of these billionaires won’t pay their own workers in the companies they help run a fair wage kinda counters your argument (see walmart and Amazon)

They want the money for themselves. There is no way that most of these people could spend the amount of money they have in their lifetimes or even

1. Your math is wrong. your math is only 1 billion dollars, not 6.
2. Why? in Q1 of 2021, the top 10% of people in the US owned 69.8% of the wealth. That doesn’t seem a bit skewed to you?

So for you, the middle and lower classes should just continue to try and spread the crumbs out while the rich hoard the loaves of

I don’t disagree with you. I just think articles like this make cashing out 6 billion dollars seem as easy as just going to the bank and while it may be that easy, there may be some fallout from doing it that way.

I’m in agreement with you. Tax them. I think the capital gains tax is too low. My point is that it’s never as easy as articles like this make it sound.

Dont get me wrong, I”m not against spreading the wealth. I think we have way too much wealth equality in this country (if not the world). However a massive sell off like that would probably tank the stock at least fo a short while.

Yes, someone else might buy it, but Musk selling off 10k shares at once wouldn’t look

How many face hunger because those at the very top prioritize their wealth over the well being of those that work under then? (not talking about Musk, but in general).

The 1% are not some already benevolent group. They mainly only look out for themselves and their wealth (I do believe there are exceptions to this rule

I agree with everything you say, but Tesla is not perfect. Some of their practices as far as right to repair are very anti-consumer. The good may outweight the bad, but it’s not all good.

I think what most people miss is exactly what you’re saying, but also just as important, most of the wealth owned by people like Musk isn’t liquid. They would have to sell of huge amounts of stock to get the funds and my question would be how would that affect the market? Maybe it won’t affect it at all, but it’s not

I guess it depends on what those jobs are. If those 70k jobs are well paying than its’ worth it compared to the ones that are open now. Now many jobs are open now because companies treat their employees like crap and like slave labor? Probably a good fair share of them.

have rich people and huge corporations pay their fair share in taxes”

Careful with that in a red state. The GOP has their voters convinced that less taxes to the rich means more pay for the workers (no matter how many times you prove to them that’s not the case).

He made some maglock products and ended up getting hired by a company to do R&D I beleive for them. I enjoy watching his videos because his stuff is kinda far out there. Whether his ideas are useful is hit or miss, but still fun to watch the process :)

Apparently I was wrong. I swear I saw someone on a video say they were $100 each and I never validated. Maybe I misheard.

The only people I’ve seen use them a lot do custom cabinets/furniture and they generally charge a good amount for their products. When you’re paying thousands of dollars for a custom piece, I

I think the saw blade is more like a gimmick. A useful gimmick, but still a gimmick. It might save some time to make a drawer, but it can’t be that much. I think at one point Rockler licensed it, but it’s no longer for sale so it probably didn’t sell very well.

Now playing

I think that is why he is gauging interest to see if he can get the volume to justify it. They guy also made a saw blade that you could cut 1 flat piece of plywood 4 times and it would fold up to make a drawer (it was really cool), but I don’t think it took of either.

He has made some successful products like his twin