sirlolcelot
sirlolcelot
sirlolcelot

/sigh

And yet your own ideology leads you to dismiss every single thing someone said earlier out of hand with one half-assed blanket statement, and you don't mind declaring your own ideology to be "reality." Not making the best case for a strong sense of objectivity self-awareness, there. Hell, the fact that I called you on

Paprika and Tokyo Godfathers are two of my favorite movies, anime or otherwise, and Paranoia Agent is fucking awesome. The world definitely lost a tremendous talent when that man fell victim to pancreatic cancer :(

We can only hope.

I wasn't aware "loudmouth blowhard"="great orator."

Yeah, but the whole post was him asking how it supports said cause.

Ha! Uh, no shit? Point: missed.

Aren't you kind of implying...the exact opposite of what he's saying? Where did he say it's "not a cause"?

Well, that was a solid piece of commentary, but not on the subject that the NY Times intended.

A relatively short chapter compared to the whole history of upright mammals thing, and an eyeblink compared to the rest of the universe. And maybe he/she meant unsustainable as it was taught. Hell, look at all the different (some of them downright crazy) forms it has taken.

Is she making the ultimate strawman argument/ rant here, or what? Accuses Drake and everyone who laughed at his stupid fucking song of ascribing to moral relativism, and then goes on to denounce the dangers of said moral relativism. Not sure if Evil Knievel could have made that leap.

Because shoving and punching people just because they can is the kind of behavior you want to see from the people who our tax dollars give weapons to, and entrust with upholding our laws.

No. Dude wasn't wrong in any of his assertions. Reality is reality, no matter your personal feminist ideals compel you to say.

Giving a two sentence personal anecdote made it about his/her self? I think you just miiight have totally missed the fuckin point there.

Giving a two sentence personal anecdote made it about his/her self? Get a grip.

1) Depending on what state you live in, Child Services might do absolutely nothing unless the investigated parties are on the verge of killing the kid. 2) As others have mentioned, Child Services exists to protect children, not to serve as some half-assed revenge tool between vengeful former friends and roommates. Get

Aww, it doesn't get the oh—-indeed seal of approval, shucks. What is so terrible about it, exactly?

Aww +1