Valleywag
Valleywag
It's funny how, unless specifically tagged as a joke, some people just don't get it.
Just wait until you admit you like well-done steak on kitchenette.
Or not handle, since they're likely to lose more money without her than with her?
I've edited my post since you replied if you want to start calling me names based on that instead of the original.
No, it's not meaningless. It means that why should we, the general, outraged public, immediately try to get this person fired when they haven't even been found guilty of a crime (yet)? And it means why are we using people's jobs and employers as judges and juries when we actually have judges and juries for this…
I agree. But I don't think that has been the case recently, especially with the NFL. Furthermore, the Ravens and Vikings are probably losing more money by releasing their RBs than by keeping them playing. Same thing with Hope Solo; if she were suspended, her team would probably lose more money, since she is one of the…
Athletes are not public role models, they're athletes. Are there athletes who may also be public role models? Certainly, but are all athletes public role models? As history (especially recent history) has shown, certainly not. Let's pick our role models based on how they interact with society, instead of based on what…
It's got all the benefits of a single slice sandwich plus all the benefits of a two-slice sandwich!
Actually, it's an iPhone problem, since Apple crippled the NFC chip to only work with Apple Pay, instead of any number of existing systems out there.
OR! Howabout employers just stop policing their employees' behavior outside the workplace and let the legal system handle it. If I got arrested for domestic abuse, why should I lose my job over it (unless court/jail time causes me to miss work). Let's hold athletes and celebrities to the same standard we would hold…
This is a great article, but it doesn't explain the premise of the headline. Why won't we see another player like Hester again?
It also means that gay couples can become pregnant via sex, instead of having to resort to adoption (as they would typically have to do in real life, given its normal limitations/design.)
It's probably because the law is written so vaguely that it covers all sorts of things that are totally lawful. Many men might get sexual gratification from a tabloid bikini shot that was taken with a long-range lens on a beach. No consent, so it would be against this law (and certainly a first amendment violation).
Swedish, with the exception of articles ("the" and "a") is fairly similar to English.
I always thought those lines were actually quite clear.