For sure, it certainly can be. I’m thinking of some of the clients my current company (strategic consulting backed by software) has had, where the CEO is committed to change but gets strong resistance from parts of senior or mid management that really don’t want more transparent accountability. It turns into a pretty…

April or March? I wouldn’t want to miss the date

I read something really interesting about the scale of numbers and how our tendency as humans to both round and abbreviate 8.1 B or 1 M masks the true disparity between those numbers.

It also rings of refusing to be a tokenized figurehead so the company can avoid genuine change. Her remarks are polite, but scathing nonetheless. Good on her for getting out.

Honestly, studies have pretty reliably shown that top-down change is actually effective. It’s just that change at the top basically never happens.

Right? If only we could return to the halcyon days of game sites reporting on game related topics.

Gets job in August, leaves by December. “It’s because things are going almost TOO well here!”, she stated, sweating very heavily for some reason.

Put this kicker in the goddamned Smithsonian already.

This energy has inspired me to step out and explore how I can do more to have games and diversity intersect, and hopefully make a broader industry impact that will benefit Blizzard (and other studios) as well.

Sure...because people on the Internet have thank god no “track record” of making death threats to people. That never happens...oh...wait...it does happen. Pretty much at every single one of the weekly shitstorms.

But by now how much you are defending people that threat to MURDER humans...makes me question how many did y…

“You made me create a Pepe Silvia-esque conspiracy chart because you engaged in standard marketting practice which made me and others, grown adults incapable of managing our expectations, upset” Is one hell of a take.