sincegranturismo
SinceGranTurismo
sincegranturismo

Their use in gender studies makes the presumption that you believe your gender is completely separate from the sex assigned at birth; a relatively new phenomenon. I appreciate the lesson on the origin of the term ‘cis’, but that wasn’t what I was referring to. I was referring to PC culture and gender studies grads

And two seconds later; I stand corrected.

Proud college grad not even taking a second look at the half dozen grammatical errors in there? Calling his beloved Penn State University simply “Penn state” and not even capitalizing the S for State when it refers to the most wonderful state in the union!? (sarcasm) No, I’d put my next paycheck on this being a hoax.

Oh, good ole Racist Michael Harriot at it again. We all get it, dude. You hate white people. Sorry. You hate Wypipo so much that you go all cutesy and made your own derogatory term for them. It’s so precious how obsessed you are with them.

I got in on GT1 and was hooked since then. But you’re right on the soundtrack.  GT2 shaped a lot of the music I ended up listening to in high school.  Heck, it introduced me to Foo Fighters with that awesome intro.

Where did I say that? This, everyone, is what’s called a straw-man argument. Where the OP has no problem with anyone being made fun of. White men, yellow women, doesn’t matter. And then a leftist SJW comes in and makes up this thought that “you don’t like cis white guys being made fun of”. Again. It’s the “I know what

Yeah, I moved up to a Passat for the period of having two rear-facing child seats simultaneously.  It has the largest rear room in class and it’s been a big help.  Planning on going back to a GTI soon now that both kids are forward facing.

The only thing you can’t do is “punch down”? Oh, and by the way, if you make fun of anything or anyone that isn’t a “cis” (wtf did that even come from) white male, then you’re punching down and critics will try and get you cancelled. Like Chappelle. Forget that the people love it. The media and critics will try and

Right. My point is, now that it’s out, tsg has said that they are without doubt dismissing the entire thing. So they can’t really make an argument of ‘trump implicated himself during the phone call!’ Because they don’t trust the source regardless. And that’s fine. They can trust whatever they want to. But I can

Oh, now you can add gaslighting to your skills. Impressive. Countering someone’s argument with simply calling them an idiot. I’m sure going to take that seriously.

Oh wow. All caps *and* bold. That’ll teach me a lesson.

Before the transcript was released you said you were already dismissing it. Before you read a single word of it. That’s rushing to judgment. That’s dismissing what you want to dismiss. You really struggle with comprehension, no?

Is there anything that could be done to convince you trust it?

Also, they’ve released it and it is incriminatory.

Let’s wait before we dismiss it. Unless I want to dismiss it. Then I’ll dismiss it.

Because it’s based on hearsay, second account information and so it would be much better to have the actual transcript. But if you trust word of mouth more than the transcript of the actual words, you do you. 

Oh, one of those. So even if the full unredacted transcript comes out, will you be one of those putting on your tin foil hat saying it was edited and we’ll never see the real conversation? Or will you eat crow?

You’re making the assumption they even have an income. Part of this article and this debate is about kids who grow up with money from their parents. People like Trump and his family. You could have million in assets and no regular income. Or you could be a retired millionaire with no income. 

You said something is immoral and I’m asking you why it’s only immoral in the absolute most extreme case. Holding wealth is either immoral or it’s not. The government should either intervene or it shouldn’t. It’s not only somehow immoral when your $ goes over $32M. Or is that actual your argument?

I guess you’re also one of those people that thinks we need to heavily tax the top 1% so we can give it to the bottom 99%.