Every single person he annoyed had something better to do than help him make more money.  Fuck this guy.

A good store manager would trespass this clown instead of allowing him to harass their employees.

Seems like this won’t (or shouldn’t) go anywhere. The two logos are very distinct in style and color scheme, and the full name of Remedy at the bottom of their logo really clinches it. Nobody is buying a Remedy game by accident thinking it’s a Rockstar title, or vice versa.

As a Black consumer, this will be a hard R decision to pick between the two.

Call of Duty has neither the writers nor the audience for nuance.

As far as this opinion goes, a similar one would be:

“A moonlander and a ChangLi are both cars”

Found the odd Farcry fanboy, for some reason.

You are taking the piss with this comment. FarCry 3 was arguably good and everything since has tried to capitalize on that. 

Naw, you’re full of shit.

That’s a bit reductive. Cyberpunk has much more complex level design, as well as expansive melee and hacking systems (as of 2.0). Its environments are far more dense (in terms of interactivity, structures, pedestrians and traffic). It also has dialogue trees, skill checks, speech checks, a fleshed out loot system with…

Huh, personally I didn't even see the similarities to Far Cry outside of the open world. I enjoyed Cyberpunk 2077 way more than any Far Cry games, but I guess it's more about subjective experience. I played through 2077 when it came out and again about 6 months ago. I always loved the cyberpunk aesthetic so maybe I'm…

Cyberpunk was originally 316m, RedDead was anywhere from 370m to 540m. Not sure where you’re getting your numbers and say RDR2 cost less of all things.

I’m just imagining some poor animator, sitting at his monitor, surrounded by a bunch of lawyers glowering at him, beads of sweat on his forehead as he nervously taps his arrows keys to adjust a slider on screen labelled “HOLLANDISER”.

While yes having a face similar or close to your actor make things easier it is not at all a necessity to get good facial animation.

Exactly. Beyond the out of nowhere face change, the reason provided for it is pure horseshit.

I don’t like the new face, looks too young but that is just my Opinion and this is not the problem i have with the face change.

The problem I have is they said that it would help facial animation and it was necessary. I’m a rigger in the video game industry and I call this statement bullshit. Especially with today’s…

I still can’t get over how Mary Jane looks older in the sequel. There’s a weird fetish thing going on.

The issue isn’t JUST that the face was changed (which you’ll never convince me wasn’t done to be more in line with the movies). It’s that he looks like teen/early 20s Peter Parker now instead of the adult Peter that is shown in the story. There's a weird dissonance because of it.

Reminds of Dinklage in Destiny. He was replaced. Maybe these celebs just phone it in because they don't respect video games as an art form, don't think there's much of an audience and are just collecting a check. Someone also mentioned possible time restraints as a possible reason for less than stellar performances.

This is all stupid, but its also kind of funny/pathetic that this person whose name I did not know until about 2 minutes ago got more people to show up than trump does to any of his shit.