silove
silove
silove

That’s why I live in Floriduh, the humidity keeps my scales smooth.🦎

Of course anal is “I love you”

Crappy boyfriends know no era, even if the technology changes. At least when they cross the line and out themselves nowadays, millennial ladies aren’t stuck in the back of a car at makeout point

Yeah, that’s slightly comforting I guess, in this case. I just don’t see how anything is ever going to get better for us if we are constantly sexually objectified and making men rich off of our bodies.

This reminds me of a fuckboy who tried to shame a woman for failing to send nudes because she was being anti-feminist and kowtowing to archaic patriarchal ideas regarding women’s bodies and their sexuality.

Yes, it’s called the Victoria’s Secret Catalog.

Blowjobs are the new “nice to meet you!”
Fingerbanging is the new flirting!
Squirting is the new blowing a kiss!

The cover girl appears to be a natural beauty. Little or no make up, brown hair and what seem to be average sized home grown boobs. Bravo! It’ll never fly.

Huzzah! The male gaze emerges triumphant!

“MY PICTORIAL CAPTURES ALL OF ME—THE SEXY DREE, THE CHILDLIKE DREE, THE FUNNY DREE, THE TOMBOY, THE LOLITA.”

Considering some of the top searches of straight male porn are “teen” and “barely legal” is it any wonder all these straight dudes are getting defensive about how Playboy has tried to make this woman look as much like a sexy child as possible? Seriously, these guys get as close to the line of underage as they possibly

Really? Because it was crystal clear to me and I find all of these comments harping on the OP slightly embarrassing.

I do apologize for that. I didn’t mean that there’s something wrong with ANY woman’s appearance, ever. I was really just trying to express my disgust at how women’s sexuality is packaged and sold for profit in very specific ways.

I thought that the styling choices/context in which she appeared was assumed. I would never criticize her for wearing a bikini in public, for example. I would never treat her like a child. I would never judge her solely for her appearance. I just have a problem with men exploiting her young looking appearance for what

Yes but it’s a different kind of male gaze. The boyfriend perspective. The gaze of a male who still wants to bone but is also annoyed that he has to spend the night trying to talk to your friend’s boyfriends.

Never seen they type of porn men watch have you? This is not about disempowering women, this is how wrong it is to make money off of women by marketing them to horny men. Do you see ANY adult women reading this magazine?

“The cover is also designed to present a more intimate experience for the reader. ‘The idea was to look at me from a boyfriend’s perspective,’ Sarah says.”

I’m commenting on the fact that many many many many male producers of this type of material purposefully make-up, pose, accentuate women to look underage IN SEXUALLY EXPLICIT ways. It’s a huge business. I’m not calling this woman a child at all. If I saw her in the street I would never ever say something like that.

I agree. She looks like a child. They somehow went from gross to PEDO in record time.

Sooooo, they cover up now but use women who look like they’re 13? How is this ANY kind of improvement?