You sir, are full of the brain crazies.

:-)

I would argue that it’s about showing respect to a character which represents an audience that is often under represented.

To Marvel’s credit, there’s been no indication as to whether or not Ayo might still identify as a queer woman or if, in subsequent films, her relationship with Okoye might become romantic.

Thank you.

Organic in the sense that it doesn’t seem like you’re shoehorning a lesbian couple in to a primarily black cast movie. So it doesn’t seem like it’s pandering to minorities or marginalized audiences.

I really do want to agree with you. Especially since the character is already gay in the source material. But it’s not a matter of representation, it’s a matter of the right kind of representation.

I did not.

Because again, it will seem like they’re trying to put too much in.

You realize they’d get flack for cramming in all the “under represented” into one movie, right?

I’ve never been hit with the alt-fact creationism line. Well done.

I’m gonna respond to what I think you were trying to communicate. You might want to reread these before you hit “Publish”.

Don’t twist it.

You’re telling it’s the officer’s (and the U.S Government’s) responsibility to tell a 16 year old drug smuggler that drinking meth will kill him?

That’s one of those things that sounds good, but you’re looking at it through a macro lens.

How so?

Except it wasn’t a dare.

From the article;

Do you really think that’s what’s happened here?

“Prove that isn’t a gun. Put it to your head and pull the trigger.”