Yes it certainly is. There's no need to make me out to be some kind of a monster because I happen to believe objectification and empathy can co-exist. I could empathize with a character who is a sex slave. I could empathize with a character whose only purpose in the story is to die. I could empathize with a real-life…

Yeah, you can't immediately remove Batman's iconic cape. What a shocker. Also, her insistence that the cape was some sentient butt-covering organism was kind of overlooking the physics of the cape. If you run and jump, the cape moves a bit. It's animated to please in a catlike way, just like Catwoman has always been.…

Again, male butts and female butts are not equal things. But even so, there are way more male butts in video games than Anita is admitting. Her biggest example was Arkham City, yet all she had to do to see Batman's butt was change the costume. I think she had to go on a serious butt hunt to compile clips for this…

Yes, but the content creators have just as much power over the female characters as they do over the male characters, and so do the players.

Okay fine, I've already admitted to that.

Fine fine, but she was talking like the designers specifically created a difference in butt covering between Batman and Catwoman to facilitate objectification. Maybe I read too much into that. Whatever.

The reason I bring up that it's not intentional is because Anita seems to think that it is. She clearly states the "strategic butt covering" is.

Alright, here's my super-serious opinion nobody cares about: