silentbobdn
SilentBob_DN
silentbobdn

I asked for more SilentBob.

But i never asked for this.

I am watching a huge robot befriend a little girl on the internet.

Yet again I realize I'm living in the fucking future.

I don't think I am able to get over the fact that the game that allows me to play as Jeff Bridges slaughtering aliens

a) is a movie port
b) sucks

Fuck you, world.

True.

This news post baffles me. It seriously, honestly does.

To the people saying this hardly looks better than PS3 games:

Is this your first new console generation? It has been like this for every new console cycle since we arrived in the 3D area.
Playstation 2 Launch:

All of the QR codes are optional. There are in game-riddles attached to them, so you can get the cube eben without a way to scan the codes ;)

I still consider Call of Juarez an unpolished gem. I certainly find it very excessive to compare it to the complette and utter garbage that is Ride to Hell.

As the first big game from Techland developed for the western market (Chrome still felt very "eastern europe-ish" imo) by a small, polish dev it certainly exceeded

With "great scheme of things" i was talking about the context of Patricias article. Not... well...the whole universe.

I find it amazing how you seemed to completly missunderstand the point Patricia was trying to make in the RPS article.

This wasn't about a bra being physically uncomfortable (even tough it maybe was). It was about the bra making her feel uncomfortable. See, posts such as these are a perfect example for why you should

So it doesn't contain the best Serious Sam Game, Serious Sam 2? Meh.

I played "Dear Esther"...a game you can' win or lose. Also "Journey" - even though you CAN be attacked, there is no way for you to lose the game.

So, there you go. If games, in fact, had winners and losers "by defintion", those two games couldn't exist.

Because, as we all know, video games are about exactly copying "harsh reality". That makes them so much fun!

Yeah, i know what you mean. I wasn't trying to ask why the TV audience would be excited about this.

I was trying to ask why Kotaku felt the need to publish this story making it seem like that was all-new content we saw there. There is literally nothing new here.

Old demo, has already been shown during CoD Reveal.

The concept may be new to you, but not everyone lives in the US. I know, right? It's quite amazing.

Also, this wasn't a video about Game of Thrones. There wasn't a discussion about Game of Thrones. Someone simply wrote one sentence to piss people off, without any other context or reason.

Oh. Awesome. Some asshole in the comment section under the video just spoiled the last episode of Game of Thrones from me. Just one sentence, completley unrealted to the Ryan Gosling video and BAM. Well, thanks? :/

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *takes a breath* BWWWAAAAAHAHAHAHA. Look at that weapon. Look at that hair! It's glorious!

My God, Square Enix. How do you manage to increase the stupidty of each successive FF XIII-game?

I'm really looking forward to this. FF XIII had one of the most entertaining, stupid stories in recent years.

Even though I disagree, that's a perfectly understandable notion ;)

Now playing

Someone already posted this here a few posts into a discussion but i really feel like it should be easy to see and on the fronstpage of comments: