/s ON

There are some supreme court cases that basically obligate a public company to do this, that say their entire reason to exist is to return money to shareholders. Not to build stuff, not to change the world, not to enrich lives, only and always to return value to owners.  And this against the risk of shareholder…

“I asked him his location and he said, near Cottonwood”

Welcome to America. Where requesting a reduction in police funding is highly controversial but police fucking detainees gets treated with the same levity as teenagers caught hooking up.

Home of the depraved.

Having semen on his uniform does not not prove anything and is not necessarily related to the event/arrest in question.

I could have been from previously during his shift, when he f**ked another detainee in the back of his cruiser.

However, he wasn’t overpowered by her

The conversation after the BJ/whatever when he realized they were stuck in his cruiser must have been interesting. 

The plan was to fuck her then renege on the deal he never intended to keep.

As of this writing, it doesn’t appear as though Hair is facing any charges related to the incident.

Cops should NOT be allowed to turn off bodycams under any circumstances.

What was the plan here? Was he just going to turn her loose after the sex? After he’d taken her away from the scene in his vehicle? How did he think he would explain that?

Maybe his first name is “Les”?

All

Objection, who is this “Officer Hair?” It is clear that the man re-enacting the video cannot possibly be “Officer Hair.”

However, an investigation into the incident found semen on Hair’s uniform. 

“In theory, he could still apply to any police department should he choose to.”

I do, thanks for your concern.

Hmm, sounds like they don’t understand how to fix a problem.