sickpuppybowwow
sickpuppybowwow
sickpuppybowwow

Pros: MMO games make you smarter.
Cons: MMO games slowly devour your soul.

On time, just like a dealer looking for a new customer.

Have you played Suikoden? Or Trails in the Sky?

Confession 1: I bought the first Five Nights at Freddy’s to see what all the fuss was about—found myself vaguely reminded of going to Showbiz Pizza Place when I was a little one—and never touched it again.

Confession 2: I will -never- understand the popularity of streamers. I get that it can be fun to watch someone

  • I always adjust the slider so that the image/logo/icon is more than just slightly visible.

If the game is being played, the game is being played... Yeah, Destiny revolves around repetition. That’s the game. I was just pointing out that tons of people still play every week when Trials comes around, or they do the Raid every week. Why do I still Raid? Because some of my buddies aren’t max light yet and it’s

Yeah, you’re so right, man. Like, The Taken King came out a year ago and nobody - I mean NOBODY - plays the game anymore.

I’m sure it will be interesting for a few weeks and then everyone will finish the raid and be like “well there’s no more content guess i’m done”.

i wouldn’t be all that worried if they’re only saying it has 5 main story missions because with TTK, they springboarded those 8 story missions into an explosion of quests and things to do afterward. plus with the new strikes, new level cap, and new crucible maps, we’ll probably have tons of stuff to do. Mind you this

Taken King had only five or six before it opened up after dropping Oryx. Sure, there were a bunch of nodes that opened after that, but what’s to say a lot of the content in RoI isn’t locked into “Quests” that send you through modified versions of those story missions (Paradox and Lost to Light come to mind, with the

When I drink wine I usually end up with a terrible headache before I finish the glass. It’s like a skip the warm mellow pre-drunk and got right into hangover. It seems to be wine-specific, however, as it takes many more cocktails to get to the same place. Beer doesn’t even register in my system. I hate the taste and

Seriously. I know people who can get hungover after a half a glass of wine - I, emphatically, am NOT one of those people. For me, a nice manageable evening is starting out with a lighter cocktail (e.g., Aperol spritz rather than a Manhattan) and then, say, a half-bottle of wine.

My problem is that I make a plan, and then drink four or five prompts me to say “fuck that plan!” and then I’m going to work with a hangover again.

A friend who was having anxiety issues more so than alcohol issues was drinking a lot to deal. Her therapist and she decided to use the two drink rule, so she could participate in the hang out, but have a limit. One drink will always lead to two, but two drinks simply doesn’t have to lead to three.

If you can maintain on three or four drinks, then have three or four drinks. The main keys are:

I feel you. BUT what I also dislike MORE, as I get older and older, is the way my body reacts to drinks 3 and 4 the next day, as if I have chugged a bottle of rat poison.

It is my hope that I will have a similar attitude towards my marriages.

Same here. My tolerance is pretty high. Drinks 1 and 2 only prime me for the mild buzz Drink 3 provides, and Drink 4 ends the night with a wonderful buzz-but-not-drunk feeling.

This is good advice. But it is hard to follow. Especially since I love drinks 3 and 4 most of all.

I would not touch a thing in that place until it had been tented and fumigated for at least a month.