What do you do when even the professors think your identitarian and sensitivity politics are shit?

Don’t forget the extreme veer to racism they take if you dare to disagree on even one point - How many times have you seen them switch to screaming “UNCLE TOM!” “HOUSE NIGGER!” I’ve never heard a single right leaning friend (very few in number in MA) ever use the hard ‘R.” Somehow it becomes okay if you’re on the hard…

No dijon?

Meghan Markle is half black.

It’s not my fault she can’t form a coherent sentence. The correct phrasing would be, “I think we, in Minnesota, are no. 4 in the country for student debt.” You can even shuffle it around a bit and it still works. What definitively does not work is “We’re no. 4 in the country for student debt in Minnesota.” In fact,…

Splinter: We Love The Minorities That Agree With Us.

You do. :)

“The what?”

This country of Minnesota, tell me more.

The hate for honesty is strong at GMG.

Libby would have a fucking stroke.

I had heard a rumor you were placed on a forced hiatus from The Takeout for critiquing the bloggers/commentariat, ha!

I’m sure the kids enjoy all the protesters on their step ladders yelling to them about how they can’t do anything, and are just there to watch.

Well, it’ll probably wind back job requirements a bit. Where once it was “Wow, you have a college degree!” and now is “Whoop de doo, a college degree.” It’ll probably roll to “Wow, you have a degree from a private university!”

THINK OF THE BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS, MAN.

“Cheap oil..Yes..Very cheap oil..”

Rude Negro is back! The sun shines again.

I tend to disagree that her defense is asinine, because if that’s the case then a full question was never asked. If you’re moderating a debate, you shouldn’t be referencing a debate from the day before or giving needless exposition when you could have just asked the question in a simple, direct manner with no chance…

If that’s the way the full question went, especially with that preamble, then it was an extremely poorly worded question. You would not use “their” in that situation, but re-state “Who here would abolish private insurance in favor of a government run plan?”

Not really sure how there are comments here that are saying she misunderstood the question. The literal question was “Who here would abolish their private insurance for...,” which would refer to that specific person’s insurance..If people were interpreting it as otherwise then THEY were the ones who (somehow)…