“ Trump’s team had (as of Wednesday) literally no pages”

Because, dummy... the opposition defines the most deeply flawed candidate in the history of this country. Stop fucking pretending that there was any parity between a braggodocious, lying, womanizing man who insulted, race baited and threatened his way into the presidency. Fuck that bullshit RIGHT NOW.

Please. There wasn’t a chance the anti-Semitic, racist DT voters wouldn’t have ever voted for a Jewish socialist. 

Dude, when I said “uppity broad”—I was doing my impression of the Republicans in the 90s—I wasn’t putting words in your mouth.

Notice so many IFs required for a female President, but Trump’s multidinous controversies and complete lack of any qualifications still didn’t prevent his presidency. This is sexism at its peak.

That is a rational argument and nothing close to the coded language of other commenters on here. I agree that Hillary’s hawkishness is very troubling, but I resoundingly reject the notion that she should be held culpable for NAFTA because SHE WAS NOT THE PRESIDENT.

So, just to confirm, we’re changing up the goalposts from “substance” to “likability” now that I’ve shown your first statement was baloney?

Part of the problem with your scenario is that Clinton’s supposed controversies have pretty much all been inventions of the right, who have hated her since 1992. Whitewater? cleared. Benghazi? Nothing wrong. E-mails? cleared. E-mails AGAIN? cleared. She doesn’t actually have a controversial past at all. That’s the…

This is actually the opposite of what really happened. Clinton had one of the most expansive and detailed policy platforms for a presidential campaign in a long time. She and her team did years worth of homework to hone down policies and be able to explain how it could be passed bipartisanly and point to where money…

LMAO. So if there was a magic, perfect women she would have won. Okie doke. No sexism to see here. In order to win, women just need to be 100% perfect even when up against a vile bigot. GOT IT.