Because she wasn't under oath when they questioned her, and it's not against the law to lie to your attorney.

Actually their own lawyer is saying that.

What he is saying is he believes the rape happened, but he no longer has confidence in the story the mother told about how she came into possession of the bag. Two separate things.

Making accusations against the chain of custody would actually benefit the accuser, not Kane. As his DNA was not found anywhere below her waist or inside her. Actually two other unidentified males’ DNA were found inside her so... it is within HER best interest to claim the chain of custody were compromised. Which all…

It’s been reported elsewhere that the father is/was a cop. Don’t know if that’s true, but that could be one way. The circumstances of the bag are the reason her lawyer dropped her. If he thought Kane had something to do with it, why would he quit? Clearly their own lawyer feels the family of the accused are…