I ought to give you five stars, because when I laughed from reading your comment, I made 4 coworkers to come over and read it.

inb4 Yttrium spews some extremely bad take likened to “hand pass stupid, Yttrium happy.”

It’s pretty rough reading your comments. evPocket summed up your position pretty well.

The world must see what Florida has to see.  It’s only fair.

Ahhhh, but of course it’s ol Slick Louie.  I should have been able to get that.

haha! Who was your second then?!  I must know what other celebrities I can scream this at!

Anthony Weiner being the other?

Once the Florida Man memes started, the entire game changed.  Judges wanted to have as much access to dank memes as possible, so they saw it as their civic duty to crack open that pandora’s box.

Correction. FOIA didn’t FOLLOW Watergate, but it gained its teeth when it was interpreted following Watergate.

I’m from MN and know MN law much better, but Florida has “open records” laws (most/all states have them to some extent, but Florida seems to make anything/everything available with few exceptions), which compels the state to make municipal/county/state records available for inspection by any person (which is basically…

On the real though, I’m an actual lawyer (not that cool). This evidence absolutely should remain inadmissible at trial (Fruit of the poisonous tree).

It makes me angry that Horford was on the Celtics this year, because he’s a freaking G.

We could use a Deadspin article outlining which Boston team is the most impossibly annoying and which of their respective fanbases (although overlapping) are the most insufferable.

Because that’s where the door was and they don’t want to order every hockey arena around the world to move their door three feet.

Or, you know, coaches teach their kids the rules of the game so they know how to play the game correctly according to the rules.

“Just because it is ‘correct’ by the current rules doesn’t mean that the current rules are correct.”

“Either the player leaving the ice is part of the play and he counts, or he’s not part of the play and he doesn’t count.”

What’s the rationale for that?  They’re different penalties/infractions.

Agreed. I wouldn’t have any problem at all with expanding the discretionary ability of the referee to include the “threat” assessment just like too many men. I just feel it would need to be abundantly clear... Which is something the ol’ NHL has some trouble with!

The correct offsides call was made. They did not get “help” unless you’re talking about the blatant trip on Karlsson that the referee practically had a homing missle lock on and didnt’ call.