Lots of things are written in papers that don’t occur commonly.  That’s sorta the point of a newspaper.

I’ve heard of this mythical hair touching. Never once actually witnessed it or heard from anyone who did first hand.  Sorta like big foot or Nessie someone finally “captured “ it on film in the wild.  The world is a wacky place.

Artists are also crazy people.  In other news, water remains wet.

Except you can’t impeach a president for actually following a law.  So there is that.

Like they leaked that HRC had pneumonia/dementia/alcohol abuse/a stroke/ a brain tumor?  You’re a delusional racist.

Don’t blame the President for using a law.  Blame the Congress that gave him that power.    Too busy raising money to worry about legislation.

No. Trump is definitely NOT a “white” response to Obama.  If only because there isn’t such a thing.  Any more than there is some monolithic “black” group think. Unless you’re a paranoid racist.

Sought after tho it may be.  You don’t fail to bring a case with solid evidence waiting around for a confession.

The consequences of An individual decision to wear clothes that are ruined by wine is entirely on the individual who wears those useless clothes.

If you have the goods you close the case.  The perp’s defense is irrelevant at that point.

Her narcissism is its own disease.  Attribution to some mythical white privilege minimizes it’s toxicity.

And stormy Daniels .

Well. When your entire claim to fame is based upon a sexual relationship with an actually famous man....

And that is why homeschool is a lesser education.

A man pointing a gun at people is apprehended by police.  Shot while aiming a gun at police.  In other news, water remains wet .

Thank you for demonstrating why SCOTUS isn’t an elected position.  

So skin tone should govern who is a justice?  I don’t think that’s constitutional tho.

I have pearls to lend if you need them.

Real world experience and outcome dependence are necessary for legislators who MAKE law.  Not for an an independent judiciary.  There you need the best legal training and logical dispassionate thought.

No. He’s saying the semantics of calling something settled when it’s still legally challenged are incorrect.