Content-based regulation is a principle that applies to the creation of new laws that target specific topics. It wouldn’t apply in this case. There is certainly constitutionally-questionable behavior here, which depends in part on what kind of employment arrangement exists between the Browns and Cleveland. It’s not…

The police have as much right as anyone to tell him to fuck off. What they don’t have the right to do is endanger the public welfare by refusing to police a public event over the actions of one person. They don’t have to like him, but they swore an oath (and are paid) to protect everyone - INCLUDING HIM - from harm.

On the plus side, fewer cops at Browns games means fewer brown people will be shot.

Accused in your usage is spelled g-u-i-l-t-y.

I’m kind of sad here because the joke is so obvious that I feel there’s no challenge to it. I congratulate the person who manages to make me laugh with their comment. My wit is not up to this particular task.

My answer might be the same for both questions: the 1989 World Series/San Francisco earthquake. I was 7 at the time.

If conservative beliefs would stop being so fucking stupid and bigoted, it wouldn’t be as much of a problem.

Your 70% stat is conveniently based on straight numbers, asshat. Of course whites are the most likely to be killed by police; they’re the largest racial group in the country.

I can’t really say much to that except thank you for your story.

If the comparison is about role on the court, it’s a shitty-ass analogy. The analogy he provided is about control. Don’t criticize us for denigrating the analogy if you can’t even see the problem with it.

That’s a bad analogy though. Durant isn’t the CEO in OKC. He doesn’t get to choose who they hire and fire. He doesn’t get to determine business strategy. He doesn’t get to locate his business in an up-and-coming city that attracts the best and brightest. A CEO who has little control over his own business is called a…