shoopdaboofs
ShoopDaBoofs
shoopdaboofs

Wasting your time, man. You should be able to have a shotgun or a rifle with a manual loader. They don’t want any guns maybe cos it’d be easier to take over? Hell if I know, you can hunt with a bolt action rifle a la WW2 (Aside from the M1). What worries me is when someone says “NO GUNS FOR ANYONE.” Yeah, maybe he’s

Do you not see how absurd you sound? You must not because of your stance. You’re at the very most a Stalinist, and the least a Trotsky believer. Both options have failed in spectacular ways...Inability to notice that is a sign of idiocy or willful ignorance.

Still amusing that they don’t blame their in-house counsel..”No, ignore the judge’s order, keep it up.” That didn’t work at all and likely put them at a disadvantage..Then Daulerio dropped the atomic bomb on Gawker Media Group as a whole. Why the fuck wouldn’t you have prepped him? Jesus..She obviously got her degree

No, you really can’t. Income would disintegrate, corporations would shatter, what makes the USA the richest country in the world would immediately fold. You’re smart enough to use ASCII (Not saying much) but not smart enough to understand profit, loss, and income? You are what is wrong with the new generation.

..And just like every doomsayer in history, you, too, will be forgotten.

The problem is the idealism. The party is more interested in pandering to a crowd that’s more concerned about whether you can call someone a latino without getting death threats. Given, both parties do this - the only difference is you end up with centrists from both sides looking at the fringe and thinking “Can we

Wait, wait..You think those union and labor party shills are going to help you? That sure worked out well with the USSR.

Why, because he’s not an extremist and actually looked at the whole picture, rather than some warped and sanitized version you live your life by? I’m sure you’d also be surprised to learn there are a lot of socially progressive Republicans that are more interested in fiscal issues rather than whether or not they

Poor delusional fool..Enjoy the poor house, though.

..No...No, success isn’t to be despised. You might be the reason the world is fucked, because you’re a Trotsky believer, but it won’t matter when you’re dead; the world will continue on.

Aspartame has been clinically proven time and again to not be any more unhealthy than real sugar.

So not only do they pay you to do a job, but they should also have to eat the losses? That is...patently ridiculous.

Yeah that...That isn’t how the world works.

I’m almost positive the entire point of this article was to show that they definitively do not “Have this.”

Don’t forget that hack corporate attorney Denton employed that thought it was an intelligent choice to ignore the judge’s takedown order for the sex tape. I’ve never seen an act of such abject stupidity.

While your points aren’t totally invalid, I just assumed people employed in the business of writing would also be skilled at avoiding mistakes or at the very least proof-reading.

Generally it’s considered wise to withhold from spitting in their face until after they fire you, and even then it does not help future employment opportunities.

Right? “We sliced our wrists but they resuscitated me, so I kicked each one in the balls for good measure.”

You’re apparently unfamiliar with Chapters 7 and 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

I was more amused when they said “It wasn’t due to editorial mismanagement,” Even though the errors in half the articles make it appear that there are no editors at all..I guess that’s one way to avoid mismanagement.