I’ve always loved this game! Screw the haters.
I’ve always loved this game! Screw the haters.
Don’t forget that nutbar lawyer’s crusade in the 2000's.
“where every store is legally required to have firearms for sale” dafuq.....
There is a difference between seeing an issue, and _digging_ for something to be upset by.
If it’s like the first game, you have to earn more upload slots.
I saw the gif and in my head I heard a wheezing ‘I will be... the very beeeeest.....’
Either it’s a future reveal, An in-game surprise, or they’re working on it, but not certain if it will be implemented. It would be cool, though!
Great article! I also love the classic Final Fantasy titles!
Oh
Misinterpreting things so they can feel superior and righteously angry is what the internet does.
CG can be Amazing, CG can also be awful. Practical/optical effects are in the same boat, and can look phenominal as well as craptastic.
This is getting ridiculous. Sooner or later you’re going to overhear someone talking to a friend on the street and suddenly find yourself being sued for overhearing private information.
Except what Nintendo _thinks_ has no bearing on active laws or morality. If I own a copy of the game, I’ll plat it using whatever software/hardware I please. I’ve stolen nothing, Nintendo’s lost no money. They don’t have a say.
I disagree. It’s not criticism unless you’re expecting the technically unfeasible. Everyone who plays games knows the realities in how they are presented and this is something that isn’t going to come as a surprise to anyone. that’s why when a game _does_ surprise us, it’s lauded.
The usual. Amazing scope, superb detail, huge world, years of money and effort... and people still nitpick as though the game is somehow underperforming. The thing it that this is pure opinion based on user expectation rather than the realities of hardware/software limitations and possible developmental constraints.…
I guess that indicates sarcasm, then? Sorry, I didn’t know what that tag meant. but yeah, it’s nuts to see how many people are blaming the city as though somehow it’s the city’s fault that drivers aren’t paying attention.
There’s a point where is it simply the drivers fault via negligence. If there is clear and ample notification of a 4-way stop intersection and someone completely ignores all of it, plowing into a pedestrian, it is not the city’s fault for not making stop signs larger. it’s not the car manufacturer’s fault for not…
It doesn’t look like it’s detecting an over-height vehicle in that photo. Perhaps they could use a system that changes the projected image based on the situation. Stop sign with situational details above or below to read after the stop sign image has the driver’s attention. ‘Stop! Too tall for overpass’ Stop!…
That’s a really good idea!
There is _no_ defense of idiot drivers. even if the sign’s wording is weak, what if the driver doesn’t speak English? The red light and other numerical signs are there as well. If they miss or ignore all of that they deserve to have your truck torn apart. before they miss/ignore other road signs and get someone killed.