I want it and I’ll replay at as as soon as possible, but I’m definitely not getting it until it’s on like the PSN Black Friday or Winter sale or whatever. Hopefully it comes down by then.

I definitely paid $20 for the GOTY of that game brand new in something like 2011

Piracy is an even better value.

Hell, Capcom charging near full price for the ports of RE 2 & 3 on the GameCube was bullshit, and those were only one generation and a couple of years removed. So this is even more bullpucky.

I checked. I bought the digital BC 360 version of both on sale for a combined total of $15. Red Dead Redemption was $10, Undead Nightmare was $5.

It’s worth what people are willing to pay for it. If not enough people buy it, watch it go on sale quick.

This one?

It’s kinda relatable. If I had to smile for a camera I’d look like a serial killer as well.

To be fair, nothing in Bob’s Burgers actually makes eating at his establishment a good thing. The burgers are implied to be good but between his wife and son, there are some serious hygiene issues that should make it a turnoff to anyone.

I just don’t understand the connection between a youtuber and burgers.

There was at least one lawsuit where someone was suing for more money than has ever existed since we came up with the concept of money. 

Welcome to the gentle dystopia of the 21st century.

Doesn’t the first amendment only guard against government interference in speech? I’m pretty sure you’re allowed to voluntarily agree to limit your speech as part of the terms of a contract with a non-government party. It’s the same principle as NDAs.

I continue to be irritated that non-disparagement clauses are a thing. They’re becoming increasingly common in employment contracts. Seems like basic first amendment protections ought to apply?

why does this guy always look like he had to look up how to smile in a book?

A reminder to always, always ignore the number that a company is suing for. That’s basically meaningless, its really just there to scare people and get headlines. The actual reality of the damages would get assessed during the actual trial, if it goes to one.

Arguing over who has interpreted The Witcher correctly is the most Witcher conversation ever 

People mean different things when they say it. Some people are just purists who want to see the source material realised in a new medium. Others aren’t arguing in good faith at all.

Oh, no, it’s WAY worse than that. Just listen to him:

So once again, blaming your audience rather than blaming what actually is the problem: Poor writing