20% is your max? You monster.

... and let’s not forget other police officers tried to set Serpico up to be murdered while on the job.

“Dear, are you reading OldBeigeGuy puns on the toilet again?”

It’s good to see you two are Good Friends now.

For your insolence, you’ll be tied to a Post while the rest of us throw Pebbles at you. 

I think the last good cop was ... Serpico? And I’m pretty sure he did some shady shit during his time. 

There are dozens of us.

Grape Nuts start as a box of crumbs.

Sorry, I was out of line. I now realize those little bits at the bottom of the box can be grist for the general mills.

Why post this? It’s not March, man.

These are Boomers’ grandkids, but yes, you are correct.

Glasnow picked the worst possible time to adopt glasnost.

Ugh. Shit like this is why I roll my eyes when people say things like “I can’t wait for the Boomer generation to die out so we don’t have to deal with this kind of nonsense anymore.” Um, their kids are JUST LIKE THEM, if not worse. 

Damn this hit a bit home, the majority of my coworkers are white. Lately they have been joking about their white privilege. For example “oh I have WHITE PRIVILEGE, so I have a car.”

Splinter had garbage traffic and was pretty much known as just another white liberal blog that was gentrified away from PoC. The Root has a much better online presence and a smaller staff. In other words, The Root has a brand that’s worth having.

“He only stayed last time because her politics are so bad.”

It’s extraordinarily relevant that the official in charge of “oversee[ing] the use of public land, including environmental protections as well as oil and gas development” believes that global warming is not real and that environmentalism = communism. This isn’t the office crank at a paper company not believing in the…

I’m not sure how we can get from here to comprehensive civil rights protections in 2-3 years, but your main point stands:. We must remember they are ruling on existing laws. This isn't a ruling that a law protecting LGBTQ people is unconstitutional or something - simply that they are not protected under current laws.…

Karlan argued that by firing men for being in a sexual relationship with a man, but not firing women for the same is discrimination based on sex. It’s not changing the definition of sex as understood in the sixties, but it is challenging how that form of discrimination is experienced.