Just curious. Why did you feel the need to specifically identify the Ghostbusters reboot as being sure to be shitty? What's the relevance?
Shane
shanerothery
The First Transcontinental Railroad was built by ghosts!
"if you take all that away it just becomes another marketing vehicle for a profitable corporate entertainment property."
As a nonregular watcher, I was surprised and annoyed by how short most of the scenes were. If Family Guy is criticized for its reliance on cutaways, which I think is a valid criticism, this show should also be criticized — the entire first act seemed to entirely comprise cutting to a scene, a 20-second buildup to a…
I didn't notice this, so actually it's OK and nothing to worry about.
I know you're probably just being a gag maker, but fail actually is listed as a noun by MW (http://www.merriam-webster…..
Kiss doesn't get the joke.
It's more than fair in the case of actors who produce their own work and/or are in the position to be choosy about what work they take (i.e., all the actors mentioned in the article).
Why is "raw" capitalized in the headline?
"Creed deserved a Best Picture nomination over both Room and Brooklyn."
What does the verb"hit" mean in your sentence? Click?
"The writers etc consciously choose to use and depict rape. Quite why may be not be clear…"
You're half-right: it should focus on his life as an ultra-wealthy child. Call it something along the lines of, say, "Richy Rich," only more proactive.
No. Is your indignation supposed to make you seem clever?
The Mirror teaser pics appear to be incorrectly placed.
This article demonstrates why copy editors are necessary.
Meh. Bob always came across to me as complacent and entitled. Agree to disagree.
Schieffer? Eww. I could never stand him. His opinions, which I didn't agree with, came through far too often, and it seemed like every week he'd do some grandfatherly "I remember when" schtick. I'll take Chuck anytime over that guy.
Still better than Face the Nation.