shadypinesma
ShadyPinesMa
shadypinesma

The recent documentary (Weiner) showed the Clinton camp putting pressure on Abedin to choose between her job or her marriage last time Weiner was in the news for his illicit behavior. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if the pressure from the Clinton side had escalated into something like an ultimatum this time around,

I’m from Lepage’s town, and voted for him twice absentee (voter fraud, registered there and here in NYC). The liberal handing out of welfare with no job requirements has made Maine a place for the leisure class of drug criminals.

More Democrats switched over to vote Republican in that election than voted for Nader, so

I dunno. Someone with canned script prepared to defend the disgusting Correct the Record propaganda machine must have some incentive. Or else you are just gross. Either way, I’m done with you, too. No, I’m definitely not being paid to write any of this. And no one would be talking about political money secretly

You never addressed whether you are actually being paid to make comments. I’m going to go ahead and assume that means it’s a yes. Gross.

Saying that what Correct the Record is doing is accepted and legal is false propaganda. Watchdog groups and campaign law experts say that it is most likely ILLEGAL but has gone unlitigated. The fact that you can point to no other group doing similar work shows how abnormal and unacceptable Correct the Record is — and

So that’s a “No” on whether Trump or Sanders have an organization similar to Clinton’s (illegal coordination with her PAC) Correct the Record. If there were one, you surely would be able to provide a name and a link to its disclosures on Open Secrets.

Again, you are free to disengage whenever you want.

I’m not wasting your time. I’m disagreeing with you and sharing information with others who might see it. You’re free to disengage whenever you want.

Things that are true:

You’re wrong on several points. It’s not click-bait to talk about Clinton’s law-skirting paid political content. It’s news. If it were not news that politicians are in cahoots working behind the scenes WITH news organizations to sabotage other candidates, the DNC would not have just fired its Chair, CEO, CFO, and

I disagree that it is not news. If it were not news, the Daily Beast and other news sources would not have written news stories about it this election cycle. My father, a well-educated Clinton supporter, was shocked and disgusted when he found out. If you want to support someone who pays for unlabeled propaganda,

No, that’s not what I said at all. I asked whether the content was subsidized or encouraged by political money, since Hillary Clinton has allocated $6 MILLION to paying journalists and bloggers as well as commenters to attack her opponents without any indication that it is paid political content — which by law should

I don’t think it’s ridiculous at all to ask whether articles are being subsidized by political interests considering that Hillary Clinton has spent $6 MILLION to pay for content, purporting to be from neutral news sources or private citizens attacking her opponents without any indication on the content that it is paid

I don’t believe that for a second. The Dems are in trouble. Hillary and Trump are in a statistical tie and half the Democratic party is pissed off at the DNC for meddling in the primaries to prop up Clinton. I’m sure Clinton/DNC/Correct the Record have allocated funds toward stemming the outflow of Sanders supporters.

But as a serious question: has anyone (or any organization) given monetary incentive for the torrential flow of anti-Stein articles popping up on this site?

Just because she didn’t say the magic words you claim to want to have heard doesn’t make her point less true. She said we need regulatory independence. That’s it. And she’s right. You provided an example that VALIDATES her point and yet you continue to throw stones. You can dislike her but you just said she’s right,

Again, nothing in the statement you bolded in any way indicates that she is against vaccination. She said that she is FOR vaccination. And then, she is making an observation on why some people are afraid to vaccinate their children. There is a trust problem — not a problem with the science behind vaccines. She is

It goes against my principles to promise anyone anything with regard to my vote. I have said that I am voting for Stein. That’s more information than anyone is entitled to on another person’s vote.

There it is. The real issue that’s bugging you.