Let me drop a little lawyer on you:

Q: You’re 70 now?

A: That’s correct

Q: So, we’re to believe you’re a gentle-driving retiree, is that it?

A: Why, yes, sonny, that’s right.

How do you think I practiced for this...

I got it!

The only thing giving me pause is the visible dent/rust on the right rear bumper. I would be inclined to negotiate them down a couple thousand with it in mind that I should really strip the car down bare and reassemble/recondition everything. These things, from what I’ve seen, are super easy to take apart because…

I have seen the historical documents.

I had (well, have... because I still have all my old Lego to play with for my grand daughter...) this one —>

So you highly recommend picking one up? If you have the means, of course.

Where have I seen this body profile before?

Oh shit the blinker fluid is leaking again!

There is nothing wrong with investing in repairs in excess of a car’s value. If your car is an appliance that gets you from point A to point B, then the relevant metric is amortized cost. The amortized cost of repair should be compared to the amortized cost of replacement.

Show cars don’t have to be original, but this isn’t original enough to be original, and isn’t custom enough to be custom.

As this isn’t that common knowledge, the title really should have been:

Checkmate atheists.

Poll still messed up. Russian meddling perhaps?

Agreed. The world is not being taken over by black, white, and gray cars, it is being taken over by black, white, and silver cars. I know it is still too subtle to be “subtle color,” but gray cars are rare enough that they stand out when you see them on the road.

This should have been what he saw

Input validation is the #1 (see what I did there?) flaw in most software, because programmers are often too lazy, or worse, never trained to think of negative scenarios.

Which one is supposed to be the better looking one?